Urban poor report put into cold storage

September 24, 2013 12:00 am | Updated June 02, 2016 02:39 pm IST - New Delhi:

The S R Hashim Committee report on urban poor has been put into cold storage by the UPA government. The report, submitted in December 2012, set out the criteria for identifying the poor living in urban areas for various government schemes, especially the National Food Security Act, 2013. While the government has failed to formally adopt the report, it has let the States decide its own criteria for identifying beneficiaries for the NFSA and put an artificial cap on the numbers the Centre would provide subsidy for.

The nationwide cap on urban poor under the NFSA has been put at 50%. Two Hashim Committee members that The Hindu spoke to separately said that if the government followed the panel’s recommendations, the number of poor in urban areas would rise substantially and hover around 70%. Both felt that this was part of the reason the report was put into cold storage.

One committee member, wishing to remain anonymous, said, “The committee based its identification criteria on the parameters mapped by the Socio-Economic Caste Census (SECC). We did not build the criteria in order to fit the 50% cap that the government imposed in the NFSA. Our review suggested that the number of urban poor who deserve food subsidy in cities is higher.”

A senior official of the Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation (MHUPA) acknowledged this. Wishing to also remain anonymous, he said, “The identification of the urban poor using the criteria suggested by the Hashim committee should ideally not be done keeping the imposed cap in mind, but the government has now imposed a cap and already informed the States that they can identify the poor as they desire.”

The panel members pointed to the problems this will bring in implementation of the food Act. “Unlike in rural areas, the identification of poor beneficiaries in the urban areas has traditionally been done on the basis of political patronage. At least the BPL survey had some basis even if there were some problems to it. For cities this was the first systematic approach the government had taken. But, the methodology has been shelved and the problems and corruption endemic to the existing targeted public distribution system in urban areas will continue under the new law,” one panel member said.

For the record, the Planning Commission which ordered the report, said that it had ‘in principle’ accepted the report and passed it on to the MHUPA. But, on its part the Planning Commission has instead sent the State-specific limits on beneficiaries to all. These aggregate to the 50% cap in urban areas and 75% cap in rural India. The MHUPA official says that as the SECC itself is long way from completion and the NFSA is already under implementation with freedom for states to decide their own beneficiaries, there is no urgency in following up on the Hashim Committee report. Practically, it has left the Hashim panel as redundant for the food Act as the Abhijit Sen committee which had been formed to develop similar criteria for identifying rural poor using the SECC.

The States gearing up for Assembly elections, such as Delhi and Rajasthan, have gone ahead with their own methods, building on the old beneficiary lists dating back to 2002. None of the States want to weed out existing fraudulent BPL cards, but only add new beneficiaries – a politically savvy thing to do in an election year.

Nationwide cap on urban poor under Food Act is 50%

“Those who deserve food subsidy in cities is higher”

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.