GM mustard trials may get nod soon

Deepak Pental dismissed objections voiced at the GEAC meeting as “childish”.

Deepak Pental dismissed objections voiced at the GEAC meeting as “childish”.  

The environment ministry is set to convene this month a “special meeting” of the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) to decide on field-trial approvals for the controversial transgenic mustard developed by the University of Delhi’s Centre for Genetic Manipulation of Crop Plants (CGMCP), according to a person familiar with the developments.

The CGMCP had earlier applied to grow transgenic mustard (DMH-11) in plots in Delhi and Punjab to test the plant’s effects on honeybees after the GEAC, which had initially cleared the GM crop for “commercial cultivation”, backtracked and demanded more tests and additional data on honeybees and other pollinators and on soil microbial diversity.

The GEAC, the apex regulator of transgenic products, had in July put a decision on proposed field trials on hold after some members objected to the use of “unapproved pesticides/herbicides” in the project proposal, according to a record of the meeting made public this week.

The CGMCP team had proposed to use endosulfan — a banned pesticide — as part of their experiment, according to the person, who was present at the July meeting and didn’t want to be identified.

The trial protocols had also been submitted just three days before the GEAC meeting and some members had voiced objections over the lack of time to examine the field safety protocol. The field safety protocol specifies what measures can be undertaken in case of a pest attack.

“This was a minor technicality [the mention of endosulfan] and we’re hoping this can be addressed such that this can be considered in a special meeting this month itself,” the person said. Mustard is usually sown in October and typically takes three months to mature.

In March, the GEAC had sought more tests for GM mustard in the wake of a chorus of objections to the transgenic crop and following Union Environment Minister Harsh Vardhan’s intervention in the matter.

‘No appreciable gain’

Environmentalists, farmer groups and some scientists argue that transgenic mustard poses several environmental and health risks. Among these is a contention that it contains a foreign gene from another species, that tests so far have failed to show any appreciable gains in yield over traditional varieties and that it could, if commercially approved, make farmers growing the GM crop dependent on glyphosate — a weedicide that has been linked to cancer.

Deepak Pental, who leads the CGMCP’s mustard project, dismissed objections voiced at the GEAC meeting as “childish.”

“These are just spanners to delay the process,” he said in a telephone conversation with The Hindu .

Recommended for you