Growing ‘rot’ within United States nuclear command

October 13, 2013 12:00 am | Updated 05:41 am IST - WASHINGTON:

Even as it continues to put pressure on Syria to relinquish its chemical weapons, the fate of the U.S.’ nuclear weapons appears engulfed in a cloud of uncertainty after a string of top commanders and other staff charged with managing the stockpile were fired for incompetence in recent weeks.

The latest incident was revealed on Friday, when the U.S. Air Force announced that it had relieved Major General Michael Carey from command “due to a loss of trust and confidence in his leadership and judgment”.

Commenting on the decision to sack the two-star General, who is responsible for three wings of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) including 450 missiles at three bases across the country, Lieutenant General James Kowalski, Commander of Air Force Global Strike Command, said it was based on information from an Inspector-General’s investigation into General Carey’s behaviour during a temporary duty assignment.

He was quick to add that the allegations were not related to operational readiness and the Air Force continued to “execute its mission of around-the-clock nuclear deterrence in a safe, secure and effective manner”.

General Carey’s discharge comes scarcely two days after the Navy fired Vice Admiral Tim Giardina, the second-in-command at U.S. Strategic Command, which “writes the military’s nuclear war plans and would transmit launch orders should the nation ever go to nuclear war”. According to reports, the deputy commander of U.S. nuclear forces was removed from his post after being investigated for “using counterfeit chips at a casino”.

A series of similar investigations and firings had preceded these two high-profile sackings in the nuclear command.

In August, a nuclear missile base in Montana, which operates about one-third of the U.S.’ Minuteman III nuclear missiles, failed a safety test and subsequently let its security chief go.

At the time, officials said though the wing received an “unsatisfactory rating” for making “tactical level errors”, these errors were not related to the operation of nuclear missiles.

Two senior officials in charge of nuclear weapons and strategy relieved of command

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.