HC allows DVAC to proceed with probe into GCC contracts

The Hindu Bureau

Modifying a 2020 interim order , the court paved the way for moving further in the complaint lodged by Arappor Iyakkam against ex-Minister

HC allows DVAC to proceed with probe into GCC contracts

A PIL plea was filed in 2020 insisting upon a DVAC inquiry against then Municipal Administration Minister S.P. Velumani and others.GANESAN V

You're reading this article from

Thursday, 8th June 2023
Page No. 7
Chennai Print Edition
SUPPLEMENTMain Edition

The Madras High Court on Wednesday modified an interim order passed by it on February 25, 2020, and permitted the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti Corruption (DVAC) to set the law in motion with respect to a probe into irregularities alleged in the award of tenders by the Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC) in 2018.

Chief Justice S.V. Gangapurwala and Justice P.D. Audikesavalu modified the order after Advocate General R. Shunmugasundaram said the DVAC had completed the preliminary inquiry on the basis of a complaint lodged by anti-corruption organisation Arappor Iyakkam, but was unable to proceed due to the 2020 restraint order.

Observing that the police could not be prevented from setting the law in motion, the Chief Justice’s Bench modified the interim order passed on a public interest litigation filed by Jayaram Venkatesan of Arappor Iyakkam and disposed of the case with liberty to the DVAC and the State government to take further action in accordance with law.

The PIL petition was filed in 2020 insisting upon a DVAC inquiry against the then Municipal Administration Minister S.P. Velumani and others.

The litigant had alleged irregularities in 37 tender packages floated by the GCC in August 2018 for relaying existing bus roads as well as inner roads in all zones of the corporation at an outlay of ₹300 crore.

Irregularities flagged

The complainant had complained of irregularities in 73 tender packages for connecting the missing links of storm-water drains on 335 roads in the city at an estimated cost of ₹290 crore. After this, the DVAC had initiated a preliminary inquiry into the issue but the court restrained it from proceeding further.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in