‘Myneni is no less deserving than Bopanna’

Injeti Srinivas’s clarification on Arjuna award controversy

August 19, 2017 09:14 pm | Updated 09:14 pm IST - New Delhi

Raising questions:  Rohan Bopanna, left, felt slighted when Saketh Myneni’s achievements got more weightage for the Arjuna Award nomination.

Raising questions: Rohan Bopanna, left, felt slighted when Saketh Myneni’s achievements got more weightage for the Arjuna Award nomination.

The Union Sports Secretary Injeti Srinivas on Saturday made it clear that Saketh Myneni was “no less deserving” than Rohan Bopanna for the prestigious Arjuna award despite questions being raised about his merit.

There has been some controversy after Bopanna’s name was not sent by the All India Tennis Association for the honour. He felt slighted as Myneni’s gold and silver at the Incheon Asian Games got more weightage.

“In tennis, we already had an application (Myneni), who is by no means less deserving and you can’t make your own judgement (as to who is deserving and who’s not). The applicant (Myneni) has made India proud at the Asian Games.

“That performance got him marks and his case was entitled to be considered,” Srinivas said during an interaction.

Srinivas, who is also the Sports Authority of India (SAI) DG, admitted that Bopanna’s achievements couldn’t be ignored but a due process needed to be followed.

“Rohan Bopanna’s achievements, nobody can ignore that. He has had the highest achievements but there is a process. So somebody has to nominate you, you need to sign an application, whether that system is best, is debatable,” Srinivas said.

“For example, in case of Padma awards, you don’t send applications. It’s more by selection and here you make an application, give evidence of your achievements, that gets examined very carefully and a decision is taken. So in Bopanna’s case, there was no nomination and there was no application,” Srinivas clarified.

“As much as we try but it is practically impossible to make the current system totally objective. If we could have such a system, then you would not need a committee. You would just rank them on the basis of marks assigned to them and declare the winners,” he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.