Indian boxing team protest against Sarita’s loss rejected

September 30, 2014 04:53 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 07:04 pm IST - Incheon

South Korea's Park Ji-na (red) fights with India's Laishram Sarita Devi during their women's light (57-60kg) semi-final boxing match at Seonhak Gymnasium during the 17th Asian Games in Incheon September 30, 2014.  REUTERS/Issei Kato (SOUTH KOREA - Tags: SPORT BOXING)

South Korea's Park Ji-na (red) fights with India's Laishram Sarita Devi during their women's light (57-60kg) semi-final boxing match at Seonhak Gymnasium during the 17th Asian Games in Incheon September 30, 2014. REUTERS/Issei Kato (SOUTH KOREA - Tags: SPORT BOXING)

In what came as a disappointment for the Indian boxing contingent, its protest against L. Sarita Devi’s loss in the Asian Games semifinal was on Tuesday rejected by the International Boxing Association’s (AIBA) technical committee.

The lightweight boxer was left in tears after she was adjudged to have lost despite a dominating performance against home favourite Jina Park.

The Indian boxing contingent lodged a protest after paying a non-refundable USD 500 fee. However, it ended up being for a lost cause as the AIBA rules bar any complaints against judges and protests can only be filed against decision of the referees.

The 32-year-old Indian had matched Park blow for blow in the opening round and was markedly more aggressive and precise thereafter.

Sarita, a former Asian champion, fell behind after a rather bizarre turn of events in which Park ended up being the judges’ choice despite barely managing to stay in the fight.

Such was the Indian’s ferocity that Park resorted to holding to slow down the pace of the bout after being left with a bloodied nose.

But Sarita’s precision and her brilliant ring craft failed to find favour with the judges in the third and fourth rounds which went to the home favourite, who was struggling to stand up to the onslaught of punches from the Manipuri.

Meanwhile, Sarita found support from India’s long-time Cuban coach B I Fernandes and fellow boxer M C Mary Kom, who advanced to the final.

“It was pre-decided, the 3-0 verdict is a clear cut indication. The Korean deserved to have been given many standing counts, going by what happened in the ring, and the bout should have been stopped,” Fernandes said.

“Sarita was a clear-cut winner but money has talked here and the judges deserve to be thrown out. It happened in Seoul during the 1988 Olympic Games, it’s happening now again. Nothing seems to have changed. The new rules have made no difference,” he fumed.

Mary also expressed her disappointment. “I am shocked and disappointed. Sarita was the clear winner. This should not have happened,” she said.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.