Super Cup boycott: AIFF fines six clubs

May 17, 2019 09:54 pm | Updated 09:54 pm IST - NEW DELHI

The disciplinary committee of the All India Football Federation (AIFF) on Friday imposed penalties on six clubs for non-participation in the 2019 Hero Super Cup.

The six clubs are Aizawl FC, Churchill Brothers, Gokulam Kerala FC, Minerva Punjab FC, NEROCA and Quess East Bengal.

The committee, comprising Ushanath Banerjee (chairman), Haresh Vora, Adithya Reddy, Prateek Chadda and Madhab M. Ghosh, took the decision after meeting individual club officials.

Loss details

The committee took into account details of the losses incurred on production, marketing and match organisation and decided to refer the assessment and adjudication of the compensation to the executive committee — the highest body of the AIFF.

The committee concluded that the clubs had indulged in activities tantamount to “holding the National Federation to ransom and ridiculing it and its officials openly through the media or otherwise and that too on presumptive assumptions.

“The actions of the clubs have resulted in tarnishing the image of the sport as well as the parent body.”

The committee also recommended disqualification of the clubs from the next edition of the competition.

The committee imposed a fine of ₹10 lakh on five clubs — Minerva Punjab, Aizawl, Gokulam, NEROCA and Churchill Brothers — while it was lenient on East Bengal, which will have to pay ₹5 lakh.

The committee noted that East Bengal had revolted against its sponsor (Quess) and wanted to participate as East Bengal President's XI, said Banerjee.

“But as the tournament regulations did not allow any other entity apart from the one registered to play, East Bengal's suggestion could not be considered,” he said.

“Moreover, as a sponsor does not come under the definition of a club, it could not be penalised separately and the committee thought it right to reduce the fine," said Banerjee.

Going by the provisions in the participation agreement, the committee has referred Mohun Bagan’s case to arbitration.

Re-assessment

However, the executive committee has the authority to re-assess the quantum of punishment and may well enhance the amount to over ₹30 lakh.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.