No dramatic changes needed to ODI format, says Lorgat

September 21, 2011 01:05 pm | Updated August 04, 2016 12:25 am IST -  COLOMBO:

ICC Chief Executive Haroon Lorgat. File Photo

ICC Chief Executive Haroon Lorgat. File Photo

The International Cricket Council CEO Haroon Lorgat revealed on Wednesday that Sachin Tendulkar's ideas on One-Day Internationals had been discussed as early as in May this year, but the world body had decided that there was “no need for dramatic changes” to the format.

Tendulkar had written to the ICC suggesting four alternating innings of 25 overs for each side in ODIs — in his view, the fairest way of balancing the advantages gained by the team that wins the toss, when the pitch and weather conditions mean that a match can virtually be decided by the spin of a coin.

Tendulkar's letter had also proposed changes in voluntary Power Plays.

Asked for a response on Tendulkar's proposals here on Wednesday, Lorgat told select journalists: “I was engaged with Sachin a long time back on his thinking on the 50-over format. I met with him during the World Cup. He gave me a written proposal which we took to the Cricket Committee in May.

“But the view of the committee, which was supported by the Board, was that the 50-over format was in sound health and that there was no need for dramatic changes at this stage. Two innovations were introduced, and it was felt sufficient.”

Lorgat clarified that the ICC Board — which comprises member nations — was the decision-making authority. “The majority decides… If India makes a proposal and the majority supports it, then, that's what the Board will decide,” he said, asserting that everyone, not merely India, from where cricket generates upwards of 70 per cent of its revenue, was equally responsible for any decision.

Lorgat also said India was entitled to its opinion on the UDRS. “The decision was made in Hong Kong on the use of DRS. In my view we have to use the full system,” he said.

On ICC toughening its stance on pitches for Test cricket, Lorgat said a pitch that did not produce a fair balance between bat and ball could be rated poor.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.