New Zealand done in by a bizarre set of rules

Not your day, mate! Chris Woakes consoles a crestfallen Martin Guptill after New Zealand went down in the World Cup final.

Not your day, mate! Chris Woakes consoles a crestfallen Martin Guptill after New Zealand went down in the World Cup final.  

Arbitrary approach to determine the winner led to England walking away with the trophy despite the Kiwis ‘not losing’

The gut-wrenching final at Lord’s, visceral, brutal and explosive, was adjudged by a thoughtless, arbitrary number-of-boundaries rule that actually overlooked which team had lost less wickets in a tie after 100 captivating tension-filled overs.

The World Cup should have been shared between England and New Zealand and it’s still not too late to right a grievous wrong that so cruelly denied the gallant Kiwis.

Idea of sharing honours

New Zealand coach Gary Stead is open to the idea of a shared World Cup if the ICC decides to re-look the events and circumstances of that epic Sunday that left millions of aficionados, cutting through barriers, feeling justice had not been done.

Former Sri Lankan World Cup-winning coach Dav Whatmore said, “Sharing the Trophy would be the right thing to do but I don’t know whether it is possible. This is the first time I have heard of a game being decided on the basis of boundaries.”

New Zealand ‘lost’ by zero runs in both regular play and the Super Over, and was, unlike England, not bowled out during normal play.

Umpiring error

Then it emerged that the final over’s pivotal moment — that left the luckless New Zealand devastated — when the ball rocketed off the desperately diving Ben Stokes’ bat and shot past the ropes, was marred by a match-turning umpiring error.

The umpires awarded six runs which as celebrated umpire Simon Taufel revealed later, was a clear mistake. The batsmen had not crossed for the second run when Martin Guptill unleashed his throw and the umpires should have awarded England five runs and not six.

This also meant Adil Rashid would have been on strike and not the influential Stokes. These ‘game-changing’ umpiring mistakes hurt New Zealand in a game of such fine margins.

The umpires could have taken their time and referred the contentious extra run to the television umpire. Surely, they would have been aware of the rules.

In a game as big as this, the ICC should have left nothing to chance. At least, it could have continued with Super Overs until a conclusive result was reached much like penalty kicks in football that go on till a winner is found.

“This is actually a good idea,” said Whatmore.

The never-say-die New Zealanders, gutsy, nerveless, skilful and full of grace and poise under extreme pressure, have been done in by a bizarre set of rules and questionable umpiring. Now, the ball is in ICC’s court.

A letter from the Editor

Dear reader,

We have been keeping you up-to-date with information on the developments in India and the world that have a bearing on our health and wellbeing, our lives and livelihoods, during these difficult times. To enable wide dissemination of news that is in public interest, we have increased the number of articles that can be read free, and extended free trial periods. However, we have a request for those who can afford to subscribe: please do. As we fight disinformation and misinformation, and keep apace with the happenings, we need to commit greater resources to news gathering operations. We promise to deliver quality journalism that stays away from vested interest and political propaganda.

Support Quality Journalism
Related Topics
Recommended for you
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Printable version | May 28, 2020 1:25:51 PM |

Next Story