BCCI treasurer, Edulji attack CoA chief over women’s coach selection

Chief of the Committee of Administrators (CoA) Vinod Rai with CoA member Diana Edulji.

Chief of the Committee of Administrators (CoA) Vinod Rai with CoA member Diana Edulji.   | Photo Credit: PTI

The Supreme Court-appointed CoA has been divided over the coach selection process.

Questioning the selection process of the Indian women’s cricket coach, BCCI acting treasurer Anirudh Chaudhry and Committee of Administrators member Diana Edulji on Thursday launched a joint attack on CoA chief Vinod Rai.

With the Supreme Court’s next hearing scheduled for January 17, the treasurer said it would have been appropriate to conduct the interviews after the hearing to avoid running into legal tangles.

“Would it not be appropriate to wait till January 17, i.e; the next date of hearing before the SC and keep the present matter of coach selection in abeyance till then and have either (Ramesh) Powar continue or have someone else take charge till then?” Chaudhry wrote in his letter.

“It would avoid unnecessary legal issues and unwanted controversy.

India’s World Cup-winning former men’s coach Gary Kirsten and ex-opener W.V. Raman have been short-listed for the post, according to a BCCI source.

An ad-hoc selection committee, comprising former captain Kapil Dev, Anshuman Gaekwad and Shantha Rangaswamy, has recommended the names to the Board.

Chaudhry said the BCCI cannot approve an appointment in the current situation.

“Since there is no decision of the CoA in the matter of the selection of the coach, the process and an appointment if any in the present facts and circumstances, are without jurisdiction and without authority and an appointment that may be a result of this process can in no manner be called an appointment for and on behalf of the BCCI.”

Edulji, a former India captain, wrote to Rai on Thursday morning, asking him to put the interview process on hold, but the ex-Comptroller and Auditor General of India gave the go ahead after taking former Supreme Court judge B M Srikrishna’s opinion on the legality of the move.

Chaudhry felt Edulji, who had earlier also called for the process of interviewing the candidates to be put on hold, is being circumvented by Rai’s decision to go ahead with it.

“The email sent by Diana Edulji, member of the CoA, which was copied to the office bearers as well, has touched upon some very fundamental issues. It has given us an unprecedented insight in to the working of the CoA, the professional management and the legal team of the BCCI,” Chaudhry wrote.

“I regret to state that it does not paint a rosy picture about the state of affairs with regard to the administration of BCCI. To put it mildly, the decision making seems irregular, the outcome of which may prove to be illegal.

“The execution, blind or otherwise, of those decisions casts serious doubts on either the intention or the competence of those who execute it.”

The Supreme Court-appointed CoA has been divided over the coach selection process.

While Edulji wanted Powar to continue at least till the New Zealand tour starting next month, Rai instructed the BCCI top brass to invite fresh applications for the position which was left vacant after Ramesh Powar’s brief stint as interim coach ended last month.

Powar too appeared for the interview in Mumbai.

Why you should pay for quality journalism - Click to know more

Recommended for you
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Printable version | Mar 29, 2020 3:29:04 PM |

Next Story