Australia vs India | Did India miss a trick by sending Hardik home?

He could have been an X-factor like Symonds was for hosts

December 15, 2020 03:03 am | Updated 03:03 am IST - Chennai

Taking flight: Despite sizzling in the shorter versions, Hardik Pandya was flown back ahead of the Test series.

Taking flight: Despite sizzling in the shorter versions, Hardik Pandya was flown back ahead of the Test series.

The Indian think-tank might have missed a trick when Hardik Pandya flew back home after the conclusion of the limited-over leg of the Australian tour.

Game-changers come rare and the 27-year-old Hardik is one. Hugely influential in the ODIs and T20Is with his visceral batting — his unbeaten 92 in the Canberra ODI also revealed his growing maturity — Hardik could have added value to the Test line-up.

Even if he is able to bowl only a handful of overs, someone such as Hardik could have been an X-factor with his batting alone.

Dangerous customer

The dangerous No. 6 or 7 is one the bowlers are wary of, after denting much of the top and the middle-order.

Hardik could have waded into them with strokes of thunder much like he did when India was reeling at 92 for six in Cape Town during India’s last Test tour of South Africa.

An inspired Hardik tore into the South African pace attack with his blistering 93, surfacing at No. 7. And India reached a combative 209 on a spicy pitch. His unbeaten 52 on a seaming Nottingham surface against England was valuable too.

Even when he is able to bowl little owing to fitness concerns, a case can be made to look at the wiry Hardik as a pure, high-octane lower middle-order batsman who can swing games with his bat-speed, reflexes and an improving defence.

Familiar role

Australians are familiar with someone like Hardik in their Test line-up.

The big and strong Andrew Symonds was initially looked upon as a ODI cricketer but made a name for himself as a Test player with his attacking batsmanship at No. 6 or 7. He would go hard against a tiring bunch of bowlers.

Although he could send down a few overs of off-spin, the Aussies kept Symonds in the Test line-up principally because of his shock value as an explosive batsman. His 156 against old enemy England in the Melbourne Test of 2006 was a resounding, match-winning effort.

And Australia was in trouble at 121 for five when Symonds’ counter-attacking 162 — he rallied with the tail — catapulted the host to 463 at the expense of the Indian attack in Sydney, 2008.

In attitude and spirit, Symonds and Hardik are similar cricketers. Match-winners whom the adversaries fear. The Indians could have kept Hardik in the Test squad down under. Undiluted aggression can scatter game-plans.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.