Lawsuit claims Apple monopolises heart-rate technology for Apple Watch

AliveCor Inc said Apple shut out rivals by changing the heart-rate algorithm on its watch's operating system, making rival technology incompatible.

May 27, 2021 11:37 am | Updated November 18, 2021 03:38 pm IST

Lawsuit claims Apple monopolizes heart-rate technology for Apple Watch.

Lawsuit claims Apple monopolizes heart-rate technology for Apple Watch.

(Subscribe to our Today's Cache newsletter for a quick snapshot of top 5 tech stories. Click here to subscribe for free.)

A Silicon Valley company has filed an antitrust lawsuit accusing Apple Inc of cornering the market for heart-rate monitoring technology for the Apple Watch, and endangering wearers' health.

In a complaint filed late on Tuesday night, AliveCor Inc said Apple shut out rivals by changing the heart-rate algorithm on its watch's operating system, making rival technology incompatible.

AliveCor sells Kardia Band, an Apple Watch wristband capable of recording an electrocardiogram, and SmartRhythm, an app that alerts users to irregular heartbeats.

The privately held company accused Apple, whose market value exceeds $2 trillion, of quietly "working in the background" to copy its ability to record an ECG on the Apple Watch, and to provide a separate app for heart-rate analysis.

"As it has done multiple times over the years in other markets, Apple decided that it would not accept competition on the merits," AliveCor said in its complaint filed in San Francisco federal court.

Also Read : Apple Watch app that reduces sleep disturbance gets U.S. FDA nod

"The value of controlling such critical health data (with the accompanying ability to exploit it) was apparently too much of a temptation for Apple," it added. "To gain an unfair competitive edge, Apple put countless AliveCor users' lives in danger."

Apple did not immediately respond on Wednesday to requests for comment.

The Cupertino, California-based company has apps for taking ECGs, and measuring heart rates at rest or during workouts.

AliveCor is seeking unspecified triple damages, citing Apple's alleged "willful" effort to create a monopoly.

The Mountain View, California-based company in December sued Apple for patent infringement in Texas, and in April asked the U.S. International Trade Commission to ban imports of Apple Watches.

AliveCor is represented by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, a litigation specialist with more than 800 lawyers.

The case is AliveCor Inc v Apple Inc, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 21-03958.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.