Austrian activist Schrems’ Facebook complaint referred to EU court

Representational image   | Photo Credit: AFP via Getty Images

Austria's Supreme Court has questioned the legal basis on which Facebook collects user data and referred key issues for a ruling by Europe's top court, after awarding symbolic damages to activist Max Schrems in his privacy case against the company.

(Subscribe to our Today's Cache newsletter for a quick snapshot of top 5 tech stories. Click here to subscribe for free.)

In a 34-page ruling, the Austrian court accepted the request from Schrems, who has waged a years-long campaign against what he views as Facebook's intrusive privacy practices, to refer key questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union.

The civil case revolves around Schrems' assertion that Facebook deprives users of the rights and protections they enjoy under the EU's privacy law, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), by treating consent as a contract that empowers it to use their data to deliver targeted ads.

"Facebook tries to strip users of many GDPR rights by simply 'reinterpreting' consent to be a civil law contract," Schrems said in a statement on Tuesday. "This was nothing but a cheap attempt to bypass the GDPR."

Also Read | EU watchdog rejects call to ban Facebook from processing WhatsApp user data

Facebook said it had received the court judgment and was reviewing its contents.

"We are committed to the principles of GDPR and have made major changes to our business as part of our ongoing efforts to give users meaningful transparency and control over their data,” a Facebook spokesperson said.

One question referred by the Austrian court asks whether Facebook's declaration that it intends to process user data undermines the significantly higher protection that consent offers under the GDPR.

Further questions relate to whether Facebook's collection of data from 'Like' buttons and other online sources respects the GDPR's principle of data minimisation - in other words that it should not collect more user data than is necessary.

Also Read | Facebook 'lost' important rule on dangerous individuals for three years - oversight board

The Austrian court also awarded Schrems 500 euros ($589) in symbolic damages over Facebook's obstructive tactics in response to his request to share the data it holds on him.

"The plaintiff rightfully points out that the GDPR is based on a one-time request for access, not on an 'Easter egg hunt'," the court wrote in its ruling.

Our code of editorial values

Related Topics
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Printable version | Sep 18, 2021 3:55:00 AM |

Next Story