Facebook 'lost' important rule on dangerous individuals for three years - oversight board

Facebook has long been under scrutiny over what is allowed on its platforms and has been criticised by the board for a lack of transparency around its rules.

July 09, 2021 11:39 am | Updated 12:25 pm IST

Facebook has long been under scrutiny over what is allowed on its platforms

Facebook has long been under scrutiny over what is allowed on its platforms

Facebook "misplaced" guidance on an important exemption to its rules on dangerous individuals and organisations for three years, the company's independent oversight board said on Thursday.

(Subscribe to our Today's Cache newsletter for a quick snapshot of top 5 tech stories. Click here to subscribe for free.)

The board, which was created by the company to rule on a small slice of contentious content decisions, said it had overturned Facebook's original removal of an Instagram post encouraging people to talk about the solitary confinement of Abdullah Ocalan, a founding member of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK).

Also Read | Explainer | What is Facebook’s Oversight Board?

It said the content should never have been removed, but it also said that after it selected the case, Facebook found a relevant piece of its internal rules had "inadvertently not transferred" to a new review system in 2018.

This guidance made an exception to Facebook's rules, which prohibit support or praise of individuals or organisations it designates as dangerous, to allow discussion on the conditions of confinement.

Facebook has long been under scrutiny over what is allowed on its platforms and has been criticized by the board for a lack of transparency around its rules. The board said it was "concerned" that Facebook had lost an important policy exemption for this time and that this could have led to other posts being wrongly taken down.

Also Read | Oversight Board overturns Facebook’s decision to remove a post related to ‘genocide of Sikhs’

It said the guidance, which was not shared with Facebook's policy team, was developed in 2017 partly in response to concerns about the conditions of Ocalan's imprisonment.

A company spokeswoman declined to answer Reuters questions about how the policy was lost. The board said Facebook was conducting a review of how it failed to transfer the guidance but said it was not "technically feasible" to determine how many pieces of content were taken down while the guidance was not available. Facebook had restored the content before the board's decision.

The board has recommended Facebook publish the results of its review, including descriptions of any other lost policies.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.