Science

Study of AYUSH drugs must involve domain expert, says AYUSH advisory

To go with India-economy-health,FOCUS by Annie BANERJI 
In this photograph taken on November 6, 2014,  an Indian visitor points to a herb on display during the sixth World Ayurveda Congress and Arogya Expo in New Delhi. India's new Hindu nationalist government has launched a drive to promote its ancient practices, appointing a minister for yoga and Ayurveda as it seeks to grab its share of a growing market for alternative therapies. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, a teetotal vegetarian who practises yoga every day, has said he wants to give India's Ayurvedic therapies the international profile that yoga already enjoys. AFP PHOTO/CHANDAN KHANNA

To go with India-economy-health,FOCUS by Annie BANERJI 
 In this photograph taken on November 6, 2014, an Indian visitor points to a herb on display during the sixth World Ayurveda Congress and Arogya Expo in New Delhi. India's new Hindu nationalist government has launched a drive to promote its ancient practices, appointing a minister for yoga and Ayurveda as it seeks to grab its share of a growing market for alternative therapies. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, a teetotal vegetarian who practises yoga every day, has said he wants to give India's Ayurvedic therapies the international profile that yoga already enjoys. AFP PHOTO/CHANDAN KHANNA

The Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homoeopathy (AYUSH) has issued an advisory on April 2 asking all non-AYUSH researchers and institutions to “involve appropriate expert/institution/research council of AYUSH” while carrying out any “scientific study, clinical trial or intervention” using AYUSH drug or treatment.

The involvement of AYUSH experts is also needed for “vetting of the publication” [that arises from the research] for its “outcomes and findings”.

Though the note is an advisory to researchers in modern medicine, it concludes with, “are urged to take note of the advisory for compliance” thus making it mandatory to involve an expert for carrying out research on AYUSH systems of medicine.

Enforcement issue

The advisory has been issued in order to “protect [the] public image of AYUSH” and to “prevent incorrect, arbitrary and ambiguous statements and conclusions about AYUSH”.

The advisory is also meant for editors of medical and scientific journals. It is not clear how the Ministry would be able to enforce this on editors, particularly editors of international journals.

According to the advisory, research papers and scientific studies on AYUSH drugs and treatments have been “published by non-AYUSH scientists/researchers with unfounded statements and conclusions to damage the credibility and sanctity of the whole system”. It says that such studies have been carried out by non-AYUSH researchers without involving qualified AYUSH experts.

Cannot jeopardise AYUSH potential’

Further, “arbitrary statements and unfounded conclusions in the scientific studies and research publications related to AYUSH” cannot be allowed to jeopardise the potential and scope of AYUSH in public healthcare and distract or dissuade people from resorting to AYUSH.

“I am quite disturbed by this notification. If such curbs are placed on researchers and research journals, it has a bad portend,” says Subhash C. Lakhotia of Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi. He has been working to understand the mechanism of action of some standard Ayurvedic rasayanas. “If we want to get results as desired by AYUSH ministry or AYUSH practitioners, then that is not research,” asserts the professor.

A knowledge black box

While he concurs that it is desirable to involve AYUSH experts in a study, he is peeved that it is now being made mandatory. “How can the Ministry insist that every study should involve an expert? It should be left to the choice of the researchers,” he says. He believes that the need of a domain expert would be context-dependent and should not be a mandatory requirement in every case. The domain expert has to be a collaborator rather than a monitor, says Prof. Lakhotia.

According to him, Ayurveda as currently practiced remains a black box. Unless people from other fields contribute to its understanding, it will only worsen the situation. “The way Ayurveda has been practiced is not evidence-based but largely remains experience-based. Only good quality, unbiased research can provide the evidence for or against what has been believed. Results of such studies may even change some of the basic principles. Any domain of knowledge has to remain dynamic and results/opinions contrary to the so-called established view must not be rejected and taken as damaging the credibility,” explains Prof. Lakhotia.

Different views

However, Dr. Mitali Mukerji, scientist at the Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (CSIR-IGIB) who has been studying the principles of Ayurveda for over a decade says it is essential to collaborate with an Ayurveda expert while carrying out a scientific study. Taking a closer scientific look at Ayurvedic medicine using modern technologies should be in the interest of all stakeholders — patients and doctors and researchers - says the researcher. “I have gained much by collaborating with Dr. Bhavana Prasher an Ayurveda expert and scientist at IGIB,” shares Dr. Mukerji.

“Any research work on Ayurveda drug or treatment should involve an Ayurveda expert. A domain expert is necessary. What is wrong in that?” questions Dr. Samir K. Brahmachari, former Director General of the Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR) and founding Director CSIR-IGIB.


Our code of editorial values

This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Printable version | May 25, 2022 1:39:05 am | https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/science/study-of-ayush-drugs-must-involve-domain-expert-says-ayush-advisory/article26763958.ece