Nobel laureate calls for stronger collaboration between maths, physics

January 06, 2011 02:35 am | Updated 02:36 am IST - CHENNAI:

David Gross, Nobel laureate and director, Kavli Institute of Theoretical Physics, Santa Barbara, the U.S., with  students of Chennai Mathematical Institute in Chennai  on Wednesday. Photo: K.Pichumani

David Gross, Nobel laureate and director, Kavli Institute of Theoretical Physics, Santa Barbara, the U.S., with students of Chennai Mathematical Institute in Chennai on Wednesday. Photo: K.Pichumani

While mathematics and physics have underlying differences, the disciplines have had the longest union and the most fruitful exchange in the exploration of fundamental laws of nature, David Gross, Nobel laureate and Director, Kavli Institute of Theoretical Physics, Santa Barbara, the U.S., said on Wednesday.

Making a case for stronger collaboration between mathematics and physics in his lecture on ‘Physics and Mathematics at the Frontier' hosted by the Chennai Mathematical Institute, Professor Gross said recent attempts to construct unified theories of matter and gravity, as in the advancement of string theory, had rejuvenated connections between physics and frontier mathematics.

Professor Gross, a 2004 Nobel laureate in Physics, pointed out that though there had been the proposition that mathematics was the natural language of physics since Galileo, the disciplines had developed in different directions in mid-20{+t}{+h} century. It was only about 10 years ago that the situation changed dramatically.However, while theorists such as Paul Dirac promoted a strategy of physicists and mathematicians searching for new ideas in each other's backyards on the proposition that the disciplines shared the same underlying concepts, it is important to remember that there exist differences between mathematics and physics, Professor Gross said. Mathematics has its foundation in generalisation, abstraction and proof while physics had its thought processes rooted in simplification, guesswork and prediction, he said. This difference starts at the level of basic education where mathematics adopts a top-down approach while physics is taught bottom-up starting with classical mechanics, non-relativistic quantum mechanics and then relativistic physics, Professor Gross said.

While it would have been wonderful — as mathematician Yuri Manin suggested — to master both types of thinking “just as we master the use of a right and a left hand,” the possibility is impossible as it had to violate some kind of uncertainty principle, Professor Gross said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.