Seeds of discontent

Criticism of the proposed BRAI Bill mounts, with farmers fearing that it will not augur well for indigenous crops

March 02, 2012 10:32 am | Updated 10:40 am IST - Environment/Agriculture

Greenpeace volunteers enact a mock funeral procession of vegetables during a protest against Biotechnology and Regulatory Authority of India (BRAI) Bill in Kolkata on Friday. Photo: PTI

Greenpeace volunteers enact a mock funeral procession of vegetables during a protest against Biotechnology and Regulatory Authority of India (BRAI) Bill in Kolkata on Friday. Photo: PTI

As the only farmer not growing genetically modified crops in Makari village, Nagappa's seven-acre field stands alone. “I grow local millets, vegetables and cotton,” he says rather proudly. But Nagappa, from Haveri district in Karnataka was not immune to market pressures. A few years earlier he tried out Bt Cotton like everyone else and noticed the yields going down every year. Three years ago he stopped all that and started growing non hybrid varieties of local crops. His farm is a biodiversity marvel with several indigenous varieties including 22 types of millets, and in all 49 different variations of crops.

Fifty-one-year-old Nagappa holds pride of place in Sahaja Samrudha Organic Producer Company Ltd, which for the last 10 years has been promoting organic farming using local varieties of crops in Karnataka. Krishna Prasad of Sahaja, which calls itself India's first organic producers company, says the group does crop improvement for farmers and also released six farmer bred varieties in the market. The organization works in 20 districts and supplies products to a network of 18 organic shops in the country.

Farmers have identified rare varieties of rice, for instance Rajamudi which was the favourite rice of the Mysore Maharajas and other types such as Navara which is good for the nerves and even rice suitable for pregnant women. There are more than 100,000 rice varieties in the country which have been subsumed by the aggressive marketing of hybrids.

One farmer grows over 20 varieties of brinjal and the Soliga tribe specializes in coloured maize. Ghani Khan from Mandya district grows ‘Tippu' mangoes in his 250-year-old orchard which includes a variety of ‘sweet-less' mangoes. Ghani's farm, which is much written about, is declared a heritage site and he has resisted the temptation to sell it off to the brick kilns that abound in his area.

Sahaja has also launched India's first farmer owned seed brand Akkadi and 16 farmers' groups are involved in its activities. It was not only farmers' produce which was on display at the recent Seed festival in Mumbai, but also grave concern over the proposed Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India (BRAI) Bill, 2011 which if passed will create a single window clearing house for genetically modified (GM) crops in the country.

Campaigners say that nearly 74 GM crops are in the pipeline and field trials for many are in progress. Farmers fear that the proposed BRAI Bill will vest too much power in the three- member authority, and the Ministry of Science and Technology which is the promoter will also be the regulator of GM crops. The Bill assumes that all GM crops are proven safe and there is no mention of detailed evaluation or safety assessments. It bypasses the citizens' right to information and there is no proposal for independent bio-safety testing.

A Greenpeace critique on the BRAI Bill says that it does not give any power to state governments to reject the introduction of GM crops including experimental releases through field trials, especially since agriculture is a state subject. When the Centre was planning to introduce Bt Brinjal several state governments had opposed it. The Greenpeace report says that there is no provision for long term independent assessment of impact of GM crops or a need assessment report explaining why the specific GM crop is required.

Even worse is the fact that the Bill says that the provision of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 would not apply to confidential commercial information submitted under the provisions of the proposed Bill. Only that information which is in the public interest and does not harm any person will be disclosed. It also curtails public participation and proposes a grievance redressal mechanism which is a duplication of the National Green Tribunal. The polluter pays principle has not been adhered to, says Greenpeace and the liability and punitive measures also need to be enhanced and fixed properly.

After Bt Cotton was released 10 years ago with no debate in the country, there was an outcry over the introduction of Bt Brinjal which has been put under indefinite moratorium in 2010. The proposed BRAI Bill fails to take into account the need for safeguarding health, making adequate risk assessments, involving public debate and participation and the right to information, adds Greenpeace. Nationwide a campaign has been launched to oppose the Bill which will put India's biodiversity wealth at risk and farmers like Nagappa extremely vulnerable to an onslaught of GM crops. The lessons from Bt Cotton still have to be learnt.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.