A publication that stands out in prestige and longevity

The New England Journal of Medicine remains the oldest continuously published general medical periodical.

March 23, 2012 12:41 am | Updated 12:41 am IST

A file photograph of Dr. Jeffrey M. Drazen. Photo: M. Moorthy

A file photograph of Dr. Jeffrey M. Drazen. Photo: M. Moorthy

It is an antique that outperforms all the newer models: The first issues of The New England Journal of Medicine were peeled off a hand-operated letterpress in January 1812, and two centuries later it remains the oldest continuously published general medical journal in the world, and the most prestigious.

Like all print media, medical journals tremble for their survival these days, but no one at The New England Journal seems worried. Its website makes liberal use of pictures and videos, purposely

Actual numbers back that claim: A measurement called the Impact Factor (devised in the 1960s to quantify a journal's prestige by tallying citations of its articles) has landed The New England Journal firmly on top of the pile for years. Of all the country's hundreds of medical journals, why has this one soared? “Some of it was luck,” said Dr. Jeffrey M. Drazen, the current editor-in-chief. “But I like to think that all the editors in chief have had the same passion for good science” that attracts high-quality work. Dr. Drazen recently read through all 200 years of the journal in honour of its bicentennial — an education in both medicine and communication, he said. Simple narratives were fine for announcing dramatic breakthroughs — like articles introducing the stethoscope, in 1821, and ether anaesthesia, in 1846. But now that most studies describe only incremental improvements in treatment, reports are far more complicated, detailed enough for sub-sub-specialists yet pragmatic enough for general doctors. And members of the public? For the time being, at least, they're on their own. “As patients become more sophisticated, they're welcome to read the journal,” Dr. Drazen said. “But we're not going to start defining our terms.” — New York Times News Service

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.