Bihar: interpreting the massive mandate

The vote this time round was a strong assertion of change at the Centre. Only 9 per cent of the Muslims voted for the BJP; 60 per cent voted for the Congress and its allies

May 23, 2014 02:41 am | Updated December 04, 2021 11:37 pm IST

The remarkable victory of the BJP alliance (31 seats), the poor performance of the Rashtriya Janata Dal-Congress alliance (7 seats) and the dismal display by the Janata Dal (United) (2 seats) seem to be the highlight of the recent Lok Sabha election from Bihar.

The results call for a deeper analysis of the electoral trends in the State: was this merely an aspirational vote, where voters stood above considerations of caste and religion and voted for the BJP and its allies? Does such a rejection of the ruling party in the State raise questions about the development work done by the government or does it imply that there can be critical political circumstances when your development record does not matter? Does it also imply that the Bihar voter is making a clear distinction between the Lok Sabha polls and an >Assembly poll ?

Aspirational vote Those who see the results in Bihar either as a rejection of the good work done by the State government or an aspirational vote could be misreading the verdict. Voters did approve the development work done by Mr. Kumar but the vote this time round was a strong assertion of change at the Centre. The BJP did play the aspirational card skilfully, resulting in the party attracting a huge chunk of voters. Yet, at the same time, the party carefully formed an alliance to create a >caste combination that was strong enough to defeat the ruling JD(U) on the one hand and the RJD-Congress alliance on other. The BJP’s alliance with the Ram Vilas Paswan-led Lok Jan Shakti Party (LJP) and Upendra Kushwaha’s Rashtriya Lok Samta Party (RLSP) was clearly an effort to form a social coalition of the upper castes, Dalits and sections of OBCs, including the Koeris. On the other hand, the alliance between the RJD and the Congress was an effort toward the consolidation of the Yadavs and Muslims.

Bihar also witnessed very sharp reverse polarisation as close to two-thirds of the Yadavs and Muslims favoured the RJD-Congress alliance. The JD(U) faced a near wipeout in these elections, losing support even in its core constituency — the Kurmis — the caste to which >Nitish Kumar himself belongs to.

(Sanjay Kumar is a Professor and Director, CSDS)

Also read

>A saffron sweep in Uttar Pradesh

>Jharkhand: Confirming the national trend

>A new phase of the polity

Here is the >methodology of the National Election Study 2014.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.