The Additional Solicitor-General's argument that decriminalisation of homosexuality is unacceptable to Indian society and is not in tune with the country's cultural practices (“Goof-up on gay rights puts Centre in a fix,” Feb. 24) lacks reason. Who is society in this case and what are its cultural values? How can society impose its will on two consenting adults' private affair? Does the entire society share the same view? Section 377 of IPC was held unconstitutional in the right sense of morality, and is in tune with the changes in the social and cultural values. Child sex abuse needs an appropriate, stringent and separate legal mechanism which nobody opposes. That cannot be brought in to defend Section 377 of the IPC.
Sivaji Anguru,
Hyderabad
It appears that the Centre finds it difficult to take a stand on decriminalising homosexuality among consenting adults. Section 377 is a piece of legislation introduced during the British era, which describes homosexuality “against the order of nature.”
The Centre should show the courage to oppose its decriminalisation as it is highly immoral and against the social order, as the ASG has argued.
M. Arun Narayanan,
Kozhikode
The Delhi High Court judgment in favour of Section 377 has hurt the sentiments of a majority across the country. Ours is a country of prolonged cultural traditions, rituals, and ethics. They unite us. We cannot compare our culture with that of the West. The judiciary and the Union government should take a clear stand in this regard.
Muhammad Musab,
Aligarh
