Restrictions on liberty

December 21, 2018 12:15 am | Updated 10:50 pm IST

The writer, Apoorvanand, has come to the conclusion that individual freedom has been restricted by the state by nitpicking assertions of state functionaries before courts in different cases (“We are not mere subjects of the state”, Dec. 20). His advocacy of political laissez faireism, where unfettered individualism is revered as an end in itself, appears nice as a theory. However it would lead to social disorder and chaos, if practised. Nowhere in the world do we see citizens enjoying unrestricted freedom of expression; there are always reasonable constraints. The arrest of a few activists does not imply that we have reached a stage where criticism of the state is considered blasphemy. On the other hand, the government received a lot of flak for detaining these five activists. The bottom line is that while zealously safeguarding their liberties, citizens have the responsibility to exercise their freedoms in a responsible manner. For instance, unqualified support for Maoists carries with it an implied endorsement of their avowed policy to overthrow the government through armed action.

V.N. Mukundarajan,

Thiruvananthapuram

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.