Recalcitrant judge

May 11, 2017 11:15 pm | Updated 11:15 pm IST

The gag orders issued by the Supreme Court to the media not to publish anything said by Justice Karnan exposes the woefully inadequate disciplinary and administrative powers in the hands of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) to act against other judges. Perhaps those who framed the Constitution did not foresee such a scenario. Justice Karnan, fully aware of the inadequacy of such rules and procedures, resorted to his own pronouncements, bringing down the reputation of the judiciary. The Constitution Bench headed by CJI, which handed down the order on Justice Karnan, has been cautious in dealing with the case. However, there is now a necessity for empowering the CJI with greater administrative and disciplinary powers to act against other judges. Impeachment, a lengthy and complex procedure to remove a judge, should only be a last resort.

Suryanarayanan S.,

Chennai

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.