Rafale deal

November 13, 2018 11:55 pm | Updated 11:55 pm IST

While the Supreme Court is all set to examine the claim of the Central government of its compliance with the laid down procedure for the purchase of 36 Rafale fighter aircraft, it has justified its action citing a growing enemy air threat from our adversaries inducting modern aircraft and upgrading their older versions (Page 1, “Rafale deal not done in a hurry: Centre”, November 13). This logic is strange to even common sense. If indeed our adversaries’ increased fire power was posing a threat to our security, it would have been more logical for any responsible government to take necessary measures to strengthen its air power by augmenting its depleting squadrons instead of cancelling on-going negotiations for acquiring as many as 126 such aircraft, most of which were to be assembled in India. Now, the Indian Air Force is said to be preparing a fresh request for over 100 fighters. Given the complex process involved for such an acquisition, it is anybody’s guess when exactly these to-be-acquired aircraft would become a part of the IAF’s fleet. Thus, by its own admission, the present government has compromised our national security by settling for a lower number of aircraft.

Interestingly, while both the Finance and the Defence Ministers have claimed the price negotiated by the present government is less than what was negotiated by the UPA government, experts have rubbished this claim by saying that the cost of a smaller number of Rafales is 40% more than Dassault’s earlier offer. One has to now await the Supreme Court’s verdict on the most controversial defence deal in post-independent India.

S.K. Choudhury,

Bengaluru

 

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.