Juvenile age

December 25, 2013 01:03 am | Updated 01:03 am IST

Recently, the Supreme Court of India ruled that the juvenile age limit should remain 18 years. My suggestion is that Parliament could enact a law enabling judges to exercise their discretion and treat, in the rarest of rare cases, those aged 15 and above but below 18 years as adults while awarding punishment, depending upon the seriousness of the crime (e.g., murder) committed by them and the intention. The need for such a revision arises when we realise that children of today, i.e., those below 18 years, are more informed of things than they were earlier, thanks to the influence of television, the Internet, social media and the coverage in detail of subjects including violence in the media. Furthermore, parental/societal control over “children” is declining, thanks to western influences and encouraging “individuality” and “independent” adult-like actions is the trend.

V.S. Badari,

Bangalore

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.