The AIADMK crisis: who'll take the party forward?

Jugaad jurisprudence, the Tamil Nadu way

There are few equivalents in the South Indian languages, or in English for that matter, for that amazing colloquial concept of North India called ‘jugaad’. According to Wikipedia, it is a word “which has various meanings depending on the situation”: “Roughly translated, jugaad is a ‘hack’. It could also refer to an innovative fix or a simple work-around, a solution that bends the rules, or a resource that can be used in such a way. It is also often used to signify creativity, to make existing things work, or to create new things with meagre resources.”

The current political situation in Tamil Nadu, with an officiating Governor having been seen to be seeking to reinstate a caretaker Chief Minister, with the possibility of a “composite” floor test, has smacked of jugaad jurisprudence being applied to circumvent the clear mandate of the Constitution.

Parliamentary principles

We have a parliamentary form of democracy, where the supremacy of the legislature is rarely subject to any other constitutional authority, including the courts. The principle of the old English case of Bradlaugh v Gossett, where courts do not interfere with the internal functioning of Parliament, has continued to be followed by Indian courts to this day. The limited inroad that Indian courts have made is in regard to exercising judicial review over disqualification of defecting members by the Speakers. When acting under the Tenth Schedule to the Constitution, the Speaker has been held to be a tribunal whose decisions can be judicially reviewed. That is the only exception, and courts have otherwise largely stayed away from being embroiled in the political thicket of partisan politics.

 

Parliamentary practice and procedure speak only of motions of confidence, or of no confidence. The House expresses its confidence in the council of ministers led by the Chief Minister or Prime Minister, leading to the continuance of the ministry. Alternatively, it expresses no confidence in them, leading to the ministry’s resignation. The House is not called upon to make a choice between two incumbent Chief Ministers. Two Chief Ministers simultaneously occupying constitutional office is an abomination which the Supreme Court once sanctified, in unusual circumstances, in Jagadambika Pal.

It happened in 1998

In 1998, Jagadambika Pal was sworn in as Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh and lasted for three days in February. The previous State government led by Kalyan Singh was dismissed on February 21, 1998 by Governor Romesh Bhandari. Mr. Singh moved the Allahabad High Court, which termed the dismissal of his government unconstitutional on February 23, thereby reinstating the Kalyan Singh government. Mr. Pal appealed to the Supreme Court. On February 24, instead of ruling on the legal issues involved, or deciding which of the two Chief Ministers was the legitimate occupant of the chair, the bench headed by Chief Justice M.M. Punchhi, ordered a composite floor test to be held on February 26. On that day, both Mr. Pal and Mr. Singh sat as Chief Ministers in the U.P. Assembly, while the MLAs had the liberty to vote for either of them. Mr. Singh won the floor test, only to fall on a later day.

 

The order in the Jagdambika Pal case can only trace its power to Article 142 of the Constitution which authorises the Supreme Court to “pass such decree or make such order as is necessary for doing complete justice in any cause or matter pending before it”. Orders passed under this article have no precedential value. Students of law and practitioners of serious constitutional law were unenthusiastic about the constitutional underpinnings of the order. Some wags in the corridor of the Supreme Court called the rough and ready measure “Punchhaiti Raj” in an apparent pun on the Chief Justice’s name. In an issue of the Supreme Court Bar Association journal of that time, the late Vinod Bobde, senior advocate of the Supreme Court, cartooned his dissent from the order. In today’s Tamil Nadu situation, where constitutional functionaries have glibly advised the Governor to have a composite floor test, it is necessary to remind ourselves that doubtful precedents must not be resurrected to constitute a recurrent danger to the normal functioning of a parliamentary form of government.

Shakespeare’s the guide

On the proper interpretation of legal precedents the caution administered in a judicial disagreement between Lord Denning and Lord Russell over the construction of a statute is most instructive. In Sydall v Castings Ltd. while overturning Lord Denning’s judgment in the court of appeal, Russell L.J. quoted a passage from Shakespeare in the The Merchant of Venice.

Bassanio: …And I beseech you,/ Wrest once the law to your authority:/ To do a great right, do a little wrong…

Portia: retorted: It must not be; there is no power in Venice/Can alter a decree established:/’Twill be recorded for a precedent/And many an error by the same example/Will rush into the state: it cannot be.

Then said Russell L.J.: “I am a Portia man.”

To my mind, we needed no “Daniel come to judgment” to be a “Portia Man” for Tamil Nadu. A composite floor test of the Jagdambika Pal kind necessarily involves two Chief Ministers being sworn in. It would have been anomalous, to say the least, if the leaders of the two factions had been both sworn in as Chief Ministers, only to resolve an intra-party dispute. The other option of having the caretaker Chief Minister seeking a motion of confidence, solely to be confirmed as a full Chief Minister, would also have been constitutionally improper. He was a constitutional functionary whose resignation had been accepted and continued in office only till a successor was sworn in.

There are no second thoughts available in law after a resignation is accepted. In Satish Chandra’s case, which involved the resignation of a Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court, a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court ruled that a resignation once accepted could not be withdrawn. The only way that the caretaker could be asked to seek the confidence of the Assembly once again would have been to swear him in again. But if he had failed to signal two-thirds strength to split the party and avoid disqualification of MLAs, it would have been an exercise in futility.

Beware the secret ballot

The secret ballot that was suggested in recent days as part of the floor test would also violate the anti-defection act. A floor test is not restricted to only members of the ruling party. There is a substantial minority party in the Tamil Nadu Assembly which can side even with the smaller faction of the ruling party in order to defeat the main faction. In this situation, a man invited to seek a vote of confidence could split his legislature party, without even achieving the necessary two-thirds strength.

For a Portia man, the best option in Tamil Nadu has all along been to call the leader of the legislative party, as declared by most legislators of the hitherto ruling party, swear him or her in as Chief Minister and require a vote of confidence to be obtained at the earliest. And clearly, at the end of the day, when jugaad ran out, the Governor really had no other option.

Sanjay Hegde is a senior advocate of the Supreme Court

This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Printable version | Oct 18, 2020 6:51:58 PM | https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/Jugaad-jurisprudence-the-Tamil-Nadu-way/article17314028.ece

In This Package
TN Govt. will not face any danger as long as it follows Jayalalithaa's path, says Dhinakaran
AIADMK reunion talks: Palaniswami faction sees contradictions in Panneerselvam camp
Behind the drama at the Tamil Nadu Assembly
Governor seeks report on Assembly incidents
Why is the AIADMK still in a crisis?
Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam leader M.K. Stalin sitting on a fast near the Gandhi statue in Chennai on Saturday in protest against the happenings in the Assembly.
Secret voting impossible, says Tamil Nadu Speaker
OPS camp rebuffed rival’s attempt at rapprochement in Assembly
Sasikala’s vow fulfilled, says Palaniswami
Edappadi government to face trust vote today
Tamil Nadu Governor Ch. Vidyasagar Rao greets Chief Minister Edappadi K. Palaniswami in Chennai.
Governor not ‘duty-bound’ by popular will, says SC
EC asks Sasikala to explain appointment as AIADMK interim general secretary
Sasikala’s elevation illegal: MPs tell Election Commission
Edappadi Palaniswami sworn in as Tamil Nadu Chief Minister
You are reading
Jugaad jurisprudence, the Tamil Nadu way
Change of guard
Paying homage: Edappadi K. Palaniswami went to the Jayalalithaa memorial after being
sworn-in Chief Minister.
Floor test on February 18; Palaniswami confident about majority
Stalemate continues, but AIADMK patch-up in sight
OPS seeks floor test, joins hands with Deepa
A few good officers
Edappadi K. Palaniswami
Palaniswami stakes claim to form govt.
V.K. Sasikala is consoled by a woman on her way to Poes Garden after she left Golden Bay Resorts in Koovathur, on the outskirts of Chennai on Tuesday.
Bengaluru prepares for Sasikala’s arrival
Justice Roy exhorts citizens to fight ‘deadly affliction’ of corruption
From farmer to CM pick — the rise of a Jaya loyalist
Sasikala convicted in DA case; can't contest elections for 10 years
DA case: Swamy, the man who lodged the complaint
Special Public Prosecutor B.V. Acharya File photo
DA case verdict shows that the corrupt cannot escape from law, says Acharya
O. Panneerselvam and Deepa Jayakumar, along with senior AIADMK leaders, pay homage at the Jayalalithaa's memorial, in Chennai on Tuesday.
Panneerselvam, Deepa join hands at Jayalalithaa's memorial
AIADMK interim general secretary V.K. Sasikala.
Supreme Court verdict in Jaya assets case today
'Governor’s delay will pave way for horse trading'
Councillor announces her support to OPS
S.S. Saravanan MLA (third from left) Madurai south constituency extends his support to Chief Minister O. Panneerselvam, in Chennai on Monday.
MLAs at resort traumatised, says ‘escaped’ legislator Saravanan
Could have become CM the day Jaya died: Sasikala
AIADMK General Secretary V.K. Sasikala interacting with party MLAs at a resort in Koovathur near Chennai on Sunday.
Sasikala stays back with flock, MLA ‘escapes’
‘Stop meddling in TN’
A look at the legal cases that Sasikala faces
Cartoonscape — February 13, 2017
Supreme Court verdict in DA case: what are the possible outcomes?
How the battle for CM will proceed on the floor of the house
AIADMK crisis: Conduct floor test, A-G Rohatgi tells Governor
AIADMK General Secretary V.K. Sasikala interacting with party MLAs at a resort in Koovathur near Chennai on Sunday.
An AIADMK MLA escapes from resort, joins OPS camp
Sasikala presents legislators before media, denies coercion
OPS, Sasikala greet Governor on his birthday
AIADMK legislators being held captive, tortured by goons, alleges Panneerselvam
MLAs at resort ‘shielded’ from media, visitors
A selfie moment for the sea of visitors to CM’s house
Karur, Dindigul ex-MLAs support Panneerselvam
Sasikala urges MLAs not to miss opportunity to form government
Puducherry AIADMK MLAs adopt ‘wait and watch’ policy
Governor has to decide TN CM issue by Monday, else case can be filed: Swamy
More AIADMK leaders switch camps, back Panneerselvam
Why Sasikala may not expel the dissident legislators
Growing support for OPS derailed Sasikala camp's plans
AIADMK general secretary V.K. Sasikala submitting the list of MLAs supporting her to Tamil Nadu Governor Ch. Vidyasagar Rao
Sasikala urges Governor to 'act soon'
O. Panneerselvam and V.K. Sasikala
Two MPs extend support to OPS
A small road leading to the resort at Koovathur saw a flurry of activity, with many AIADMK leaders and Ministers visiting the MLAs on Friday.
Not forced to stay at resort: AIADMK MLAs
E. Madhusudhanan flanked by O. Panneerselvam and K.P. Munusamy addresses the media in Chennai on Friday.
Expulsions galore as factions await Governor’s call
AIADMK general secretary V.K. Sasikala leaves after paying her tributes at the Jayalalithaa memorial, in Chennai on Thursday.
Swearing-in delayed to split party: Sasikala
After MGR’s demise in 1987 the party split, with Jayalalithaa heading one faction and MGR’s widow, Janaki Ramachandran, leading the other with the support of senior leaders such as Rm. Veerappan. Janaki was made Chief Minister on January 7, 1988, with the support of 97 members in a House of 234, after she won the confidence motion in a voting marred by allegations of foul play. The Union government led by Rajiv Gandhi dismissed her government.
Jayalalithaa vs Janaki: The last succession battle
Sasikala misconstrued my praise for OPS: Duraimurugan
AIADMK power struggle: Movers and shakers
Sasikala broke promise, betrayed Jayalalithaa: Panneerselvam
Panneerselvam camp files formal complaint against ‘illegal confinement’ of MLAs
WhatsApp forwards exhort MLAs to support OPS
Governor holds talks with Girija Vaidhyanathan
Will she, won’t she? The wait for Deepa continues
TN Governor likely to await SC judgement in Sasikala case
SC refuses urgent hearing on plea to restrain Sasikala from taking over as CM
O. Panneerselvam and V.K. Sasikala
Making sense of the numbers game
Cartoonscape — February 10, 2017
‘Every member of Sasikala’s family controls party now’
Pro-Sasikala MLAs get barrage of calls
AIADMK general secretary V.K. Sasikala leaves after paying her tributes at the Jayalalithaa memorial, in Chennai on Thursday.
Sasikala stakes claim, all eyes on Governor
O. Panneerselvam and V.K. Sasikala
Tamil Nadu witnesses its own Game of Thrones
Former Finance Minister P. Chidambaram.
There is a disconnect between ruling party leaders and people of Tamil Nadu: Chidambaram
AIADMK MPs rally behind Sasikala
Governor could exercise ‘window of discretion’ to delay swearing-in: Chidambaram
In TN, all eyes on Raj Bhavan now
A stopgap Chief Minister who became unstoppable
AIADMK MLAs in Puducherry play it safe
Stalin demands CBI inquiry into threat to Panneerselvam
Support pours in for OPS in Thoothukudi
DMK slams Sasikala, seeks CBI probe into Panneerselvam’s allegations
No one can divide AIADMK, says Sasikala
Panneerselvam dismisses Sasikala’s charge of DMK conspiracy
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister O. Panneerselvam speaking to mediapersons on Wednesday.
Judicial inquiry will be ordered into Jayalalithaa's death: Panneerselvam
Twitterati give Panneerselvam a big thumbs up
Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi
No legal problem to Sasikala's appointment as CM: A-G
Tamil Nadu CM O. Panneerselvam at the Jayalalithaa memorial
OPS revolts, says he was forced to quit
Former speaker P.H. Pandian hits out at Sasikala
Sasikala not eligible to become CM, says AIADMK leader
Party cadres greet V.K. Sasikala.
No clarity on date of Sasikala’s swearing-in
Next Story