The right to choose

July 16, 2013 12:56 am | Updated November 17, 2021 04:14 am IST

A personal tragedy which shattered an Indian family living in Ireland has catalysed that country’s political class to debate and overhaul one of its oldest and most restrictive laws. Savita Halappanavar, who left Karnataka with her husband to raise a family in Ireland, suffered a fatal miscarriage in October 2012 after being denied the abortion she requested. Her shocking and preventable death has not been in vain. Last week, members of the Irish Parliament’s lower house, the Dáil Éireann, passed the >Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill , 2013, which allows medical practitioners to terminate a pregnancy if it poses a “substantial” or “immediate” risk to the mother’s life. The law heeds the recommendations of an investigative report commissioned by Ireland’s Health Service Executive, which lambasted extant regulations that deterred Mrs. Halappanavar’s doctors from performing a life-saving abortion, rendering them insensitive to her health. Upon its final enactment, the Bill will offer considerable latitude to Ireland’s doctors in evaluating and, where needed, aborting risky pregnancies on a case-to-case basis, presumably in consultation with patients and their families. Nevertheless, the law is still some distance away from embracing a ‘pro-choice’ approach: an amendment introduced by women TDs that would have permitted the termination of pregnancies arising from rape or incest failed to win support in the Dáil.

If this development highlights the declining influence of the Roman Catholic Church, which is staunchly opposed to abortion, in Irish politics, the Church has left no stone unturned to defeat the Bill. Not all Catholic countries, however, have opened their doors to progressive abortion law. Latin America’s record on this count has been abysmal. Six countries in the region still endorse a blanket ban on abortion — among them Chile, where an 11-year-old girl, pregnant after being raped by her mother’s partner, was in the news recently for announcing her decision to “have the baby.” Far from expressing their concern at the girl’s declaration — doubtless extracted through coercion — Chilean lawmakers have, rather deplorably, given their thumbs-up to it. One politician claimed the child was “prepared” to be a mother, given that her menstrual cycle had begun. He later apologised. President Sebastian Piñera has waded straight into the controversy by praising the girl’s “depth and maturity.” If only depth and maturity were transferable attributes, the girl could pass them on to Mr. Piñera and other politicians around the world who continue to deny women their rights to reproductive health and autonomy over their bodies.

This editorial has been corrected to incorporate the following correction:

A sentence in “The right to choose” (Editorial, July 16, 2013) read: “Seven countries in the region still endorse a blanket ban on abortion …” Actually, there are only six countries in Latin America that have a blanket ban on abortion.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.