Regulating hospitals is healthy

February 14, 2012 12:22 am | Updated 12:22 am IST

The proposed enhancement of public health expenditure in India as a percentage of GDP during the Twelfth Plan will deploy massive tax funds in a sector that is poorly regulated. If the government accepts the recommendation of the High Level Expert Group of the Planning Commission on Universal Health Coverage to increase government expenditure on health to 2.5 per cent of GDP from 1.2 per cent today, there will be an estimated five-fold increase in per capita public spending. It is inevitable that private health infrastructure is tapped to provide UHC, at least in the short term, while the government-run system is improved qualitatively and quantitatively. Such a massive increase in public spending requires a review of regulation of the entire sector, covering all categories of hospitals and clinical establishments. The Clinical Establishment Act, 2010 makes a beginning in this regard but it has a long way to go as it requires ratification by States to be applicable, except in Arunachal Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Sikkim and Union Territories which are already covered. It is essential that State governments move quickly to ratify the Central Act, considering that they are committing huge public funds for health insurance schemes to purchase care from private hospitals.

Benchmarking care is a standard requirement for hospitals and clinical facilities in the developed world. India's efforts in this regard remain fragmented, with the National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Providers, the Indian Public Health Standards, and the Clinical Establishment Act attempting to define standards. What the country needs is one integrated standards and regulatory system, requiring compulsory registration and regulation. The decision of the NABH to make surprise visits to hospitals to verify uniform adherence to its standards is certainly welcome, but incremental approaches will not do. A single empowered national standards body is needed, and the Planning Commission group has a worthwhile recommendation on forming a national regulatory body, State units and subsidiary agencies to evolve protocols, accreditation and evaluation norms. Somewhat disappointingly, a section of medical professionals has opposed such measures on the ground that it would unleash an inspector raj. Such a prospect can be avoided by building a transparent system that mandates pro-active disclosure for all stakeholders. As things stand, the medical community does have a genuine demand for clear rules under the Act. Achieving high standards in healthcare and empowerment of patients is not possible without standard-setting and strong regulation. Laissez faire cannot deliver.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.