Playing with fire

If there is one achievement of the India-Pakistan peace process that has stood out over everything else, it is the ceasefire along the Line of Control that the two countries agreed to nearly a decade ago. Since 2003, when the ceasefire began, it has brought real improvement to the lives of people living along both sides of the LoC.

January 10, 2013 12:32 am | Updated December 04, 2021 11:08 pm IST

If there is one achievement of the India-Pakistan peace process that has stood out over everything else, it is the ceasefire along the Line of Control that the two countries agreed to nearly a decade ago. Since 2003, when the ceasefire began, it has brought real improvement to the lives of people living along both sides of the LoC. It liberated them from the daily fear of getting caught in the frequent exchange of artillery and joining the tragic ranks of those >killed in “cross-LoC firing”. It is alarming, then, that this confidence-building measure, on the good health of which hang many others, has also been repeatedly violated and jeopardised. In the latest incident, India has alleged that Pakistani troops brazenly crossed the LoC and killed two Indian soldiers, charges that Pakistan denies. Two days earlier, on January 6, there was another incident in which Pakistan alleged that India had crossed into its side of the border and that one of its soldiers was killed in the attack; India claims its troops undertook “controlled retaliation” to unprovoked firing from the Pakistan side. It would seem that with all its troubles on its western border, the Pakistan Army would have little appetite for trouble on its eastern front. Indeed, this is the conventional wisdom on why the Pakistan military did not stand in the way of improving trade relations with India. But the unfortunate reality is that despite better ties on several fronts, relations between the two countries remain vulnerable to the slightest provocation.

The facts of each violation have never been easy to ascertain but are usually linked to local-level tensions. As with any ceasefire, the two armies have in place an elaborate system to deal with violations. The field commanders of both sides hold regular meetings and a hotline connects the Directors-General of Military Operations. While this has helped shepherd the truce through all these years, the question that remains unanswered is why despite such high-level contacts, violations continue to take place with such dangerous frequency — there have been 72 incidents just in the last 13 months, the highest in recent years, a large number of them in sectors south of Pir Panjal. This, the 10th year of the ceasefire, marred as it is by the latest incident, may be the right time for the two militaries to explore ways of strengthening the agreement, and perhaps, to consider ramping up their level of interaction. Given the apparent seriousness of the latest incident, India has been right to make a strong diplomatic protest, but it should ensure that the bad blood over this does not affect the progress, however meagre, in other areas of bilateral relations.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.