Muddy waters, made muddier

December 17, 2012 01:24 am | Updated December 04, 2021 11:34 pm IST

Either Narendra Modi is completely clueless about how countries negotiate territorial disputes, which is worrying because he has prime ministerial ambitions and India has bigger boundary problems than Sir Creek; or, equally worryingly, he was being deliberately misleading about the facts in a cynical vote-catching attempt, with no thought to the larger consequences. In a letter to Manmohan Singh, made public before it even reached the addressee, the Gujarat Chief Minister accused the Prime Minister of planning to “hand over” Sir Creek to Pakistan. In subsequent explanations about the timing of the letter, Mr. Modi said he believed the handing-over was to happen during the visit of Pakistani Interior Minister Rehman Malik. First, the no-brainer: the Interior Ministry does not handle territorial issues with India; even assuming the “handover” of Sir Creek to Pakistan was a done deal, it would have hardly been kept a secret in that country, and someone far above Mr. Malik’s pay-grade would have arrived to do the handshaking in New Delhi.

The facts about that 99-km estuary in the Rann of Kutch are these: Pakistan claims the entire width of the creek, right up to its eastern coast, while India says the boundary must be drawn down its middle; it was one of the subjects in the India-Pakistan composite dialogue that resumed under Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s prime ministership in 2004. Six rounds of talks have taken place, the two sides have conducted a joint survey of the creek and exchanged maps showing their respective positions. Despite the conviction that the two countries are tantalisingly close to resolving the issue, there is no agreement yet. Scheduled talks in December 2008 did not take place because of the post-Mumbai attacks freeze on dialogue. The momentum towards resolution, under pressure of a May 2009 deadline by the U.N. Convention on Law of the Sea for signatories to claim maritime rights over territorial waters, contiguous zones, EEZs and the continental shelf, evaporated. Since last year, the two sides have made attempts to pick up the threads of the negotiations. What is truly puzzling about Mr. Modi’s fantastic claims on the disposal of Sir Creek is that such ploys are more typically associated with losing candidates, whereas he is supposed to be poised at the edge of one more victory. That anomaly aside, what his allegations have done is to poison the ground for a breakthrough. It is hardly a secret that the resolution of any territorial dispute requires give and take; this is true for Sir Creek too. Mr. Modi’s posturing and the UPA’s response have politicised the issue, making such compromise even more difficult than it is now, not just for India, but Pakistan too.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.