Justice Karnan vs Supreme Court: saga of a defiant judge

Jailing a judge: On Justice Karnan arrest

Justice Karnan’s imprisonment should have been avoided to keep the judiciary’s dignity

The imprisonment of Justice C.S. Karnan, who recently retired as a judge of the Calcutta High Court, for contempt is the culmination of a series of unfortunate and unpleasant developments. It was a step that was best avoided in the interest of maintaining the dignity of the judiciary. It is indeed true that Justice Karnan’s offences in making wild and totally unsubstantiated allegations against a number of fellow judges, and his tactics of intimidation against Chief Justices who tried over the years to discipline him, were shocking and completely unacceptable. However, a Supreme Court that allowed him to enter the hallowed portals of the higher judiciary would have done better had it adopted a more pragmatic approach. Mr. Karnan was due to retire and it would have been sufficient if he was allowed to do so under a dark cloud of dishonour, after spending his last days in office stripped of judicial work. It is an extraordinarily low moment for the institution that a man who the Supreme Court felt needed his mental health evaluated should be sentenced for contempt of court, arrested and sent to jail. As for alternatives to imprisonment, recommending his impeachment to Parliament was a possibility the Supreme Court may have also done well to consider. There is no defence of Justice Karnan’s disdainful refusal to answer the contempt charge or going into hiding to avoid arrest for nearly seven weeks — actions that only served to reinforce his waywardness and disregard for the law.

It is also time for some introspection within the judiciary on the manner in which judges are chosen. That someone as ill-suited to judicial office as Justice Karnan entered the superior judiciary exposes the inadequacies of the collegium system. The absence of a mechanism to discipline recalcitrant judges is another glaring lacuna in the existing system. With the Constitution prescribing impeachment by Parliament, a long-winded and cumbersome process, as the sole means to remove a judge, Chief Justices of the High Courts are at their wits’ end when it comes to dealing with refractory judges who are not amenable to any discipline or capable of self-restraint. Non-allotment of judicial work and transfer to another High Court are measures available for the purpose, but in Mr. Karnan’s case these hardly had any chastening effect. Instead, he continued to make the self-serving claim that he was being victimised because he was a Dalit. He now has the option of moving the court to seek suspension of his sentence or appealing to the President for its remission. No one would really grudge Mr. Karnan an opportunity to secure his liberty, but one can only hope that in future he does not use his time in prison to play to the gallery and portray himself as a martyr in the cause of fighting corruption in the judiciary.

This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Printable version | Jul 9, 2020 5:11:45 AM | https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/jailing-a-judge/article19120637.ece

In Depth
Delhi High Court dismisses Justice Karnan’s plea against contempt law
Karnan petitions Ram Nath Kovind seeking remission of sentence
You are reading Jailing a judge: On Justice Karnan arrest
Justice Karnan
Karnan: a long history of confrontation with colleagues
Supreme Court registry dismisses Justice Karnan’s writ petition
Jail for contempt: Justice Karnan seeks President’s intervention
Justice Karnan tells SC he wants to challenge his conviction
SC sentences Justice Karnan to six months imprisonment
Karnan orders 5-year RI for CJI, 7 other SC judges
Justice Karnan refuses to undergo medical test
Karnan issues warrant against CJI, six judges
SC orders Karnan to be medically examined
Now, Karnan ‘bans’ travel of SC judges
Justice Karnan's outrageous defiance
Karnan directs SC judges to appear before him
Karnan visits HC, doesn’t do administrative, judicial work
Arrest me, imprison me, Karnan dares SC
Respond to contempt notice in four weeks, SC tells Justice Karnan
Justice Karnan rejects warrant issued by Supreme Court
Justice Karnan threatens to prosecute SC judges
Supreme Court issues bailable warrants against Justice Karnan
Justice Karnan fails to show up in SC
Justice Karnan: Contempt notice a violation of natural justice principles
In a first, SC issues contempt notice against HC Judge Karnan
Madras High Court judge C. S. Karnan.
Passed erroneous order due to mental frustration: Karnan
Madras High Court judge C. S. Karnan.
Judicial hierarchy comes under strain as Madras HC judge ‘stays’ his transfer
Madras High Court judge C. S. Karnan.
Justice Karnan’s judicial journey
Supreme Court on Monday refused to pass an interim order on a fervent plea of Congress against “illegal” swearing-in of its rebel leader Kalikho Pul-led government in Arunachal Pradesh, saying it can “set the clock back” if the Governor’s actions are found unconstitutional.
Stop allotting work to Justice Karnan, SC tells Madras High Court
Collegium recommends transfer of High Court judges
Next Story