Shuffling the deckchairs?

Updated - December 04, 2021 11:02 pm IST

Abrupt > political realignments are not uncommon in Nepal. After the United Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist-Centre) led by Pushpa Kamal Dahal ‘Prachanda’ withdrew support to K.P. Oli’s Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist-Leninist)-led government last week, >another such rearrangement appears to be on the cards . A no-confidence motion is due to be taken up in Parliament on July 21, and the numbers are stacked against Mr. Oli. The opposition Nepali Congress led by Sher Bahadur Deuba and the UCPN(M-C) have worked out an alternative arrangement to share power. Mr. Prachanda will lead the government for nine months, and Mr. Deuba will then take over for the next nine months until the scheduled parliamentary elections. If, as expected, the UCPN(M-C)-NC coalition manages to form the government with the support of smaller Madhesi parties and other groups, this would mark the 24th government in the 26 years since the first Jan Andolan led to the end of absolute monarchy and the beginning of parliamentary democracy in Nepal. The creation of a new republic in 2008 has not changed things — there have been eight prime ministers in eight years. Mr. Oli’s government had barely managed to get a grip on the reconstruction effort after the devastation of the 2015 earthquake and the instability in the federal arrangement after the turmoil in the Terai with Madhesi groups protesting against the new Constitution.

The promulgation of a Constitution took place in a peculiar set of circumstances. Following the second Constituent Assembly elections, the “status quoists” — political leaders across parties who were not part of the second Jan Andolan in support of a federal republic — led the process of promulgation. Mr. Oli, one such politician, had never showed any enthusiasm for a truly federal Nepal and chose to ignore the demands of Madhesi, Tharu and Janajati groups that sought greater decentralisation of power. With Mr. Prachanda’s volte face on this issue, a marriage of convenience made it possible for Mr. Oli to remain in power with the support of a motley group in Parliament comprising Maoists and former royalists. Hushed in this power game were the issues the Maoists originally stood for: recognition of the less privileged sections through a federal restructuring of the state, and redistribution. With little movement on these issues in the past year, a fresh start can be possible if Mr. Prachanda and Mr. Deuba commit to fulfilling some of the federal demands and to redouble post-quake reconstruction efforts. Given the Nepali political class’s track record, there is bound to be cynicism. It is up to the two to prove the cynics wrong.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.