About 500 words | Columns

The antilibrary and the value of unread books

It happened on the first day of the year, so it must be significant. Except that it has happened on a few other days besides. The visitor looks at my bookshelves and asks, “Have you read all these books?” When I was younger, I assumed the question was a sign of illiteracy, and could only be asked by someone who had never read a book in his life.

Now, older and wiser, and importantly, more tolerant, I merely look away and pretend I haven’t heard the question. Or smile enigmatically (a useful way to confuse the other person). It has become a minor irritant, no more, like finding that one side of the shoelace is longer than the other, or that the important-looking letter that arrived by courier is only asking for donations for some hare-brained scheme.

The math is simple. If I live to be a 100, and read a single book fully every day of my life till then, I would still not have read all the books on my shelves. The obvious question was answered by the novelist Nick Hornby in one of his columns: “I don’t want anyone writing to me to point out that I spend too much money on books many of which I will never read. My intentions are good. Anyway, its my money …”

In a 70-year period reading a book a day, we would complete just over 25,000 books, which, according to the philosopher and writer Umberto Eco is “a trifle”. Eco had between thirty and forty thousand books in his collection. He recoiled when anyone asked him that “have you read everything…” question, and many potential friendships were nipped in the bud thus.

“Unread books are much more valuable than read ones,” explained Nassim Taleb using Eco’s library as an example in The Black Swan. He called the unread books the “antilibrary”. Eco reacted because he thought his visitor was somehow castigating him for showing off the floor-to-ceiling collection. But in fact it was a sign of both a greater acquisition of knowledge as well as a greater thirst for it. As Taleb says, “The more you know, the larger the rows of unread books.”

All of which is wonderful. I possess neither Eco’s range of books nor his vast spread of knowledge and original thinking, but I love the concept of the antilibrary, and will pretend that Taleb’s explanation applies to me as well. It is some consolation for the panicky feeling all of us get occasionally: “So much to do (in this case, read), and so little time.”

But how do I introduce it into the conversation when someone asks, “have you read etc..” without sounding pretentious? Perhaps I should say, “These books aren’t for reading. They are merely decoration.” The visitor will take it as confirmation that I buy books merely to show off (which is not a bad thing by the way – it is better than buying French perfumes to show off). And go away satisfied.

(Suresh Menon is Contributing Editor, The Hindu)

Recommended for you
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Printable version | Jul 9, 2020 10:22:51 PM | https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/columns/the-antilibrary-and-the-value-of-unread-books/article27109080.ece

Next Story