Malegaon blast: victim seeks to intervene in Purohit’s plea

HC adjourns the matter till November 25

November 04, 2020 12:08 am | Updated 12:08 am IST - Mumbai

Nisar Ahmed Sayyed Bilal, a victim and father of a man who died in the 2008 Malegaon blast, moved the Bombay High Court on Tuesday to intervene in a plea filed by accused Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit seeking to quash all charges against him.

Mr. Bilal was represented by former additional solicitor general B.A. Desai who filed an application to be impleaded as a party in Mr. Purohit’s petition filed in September. Former attorney general Mukul Rohatgi, who was appearing for Mr. Purohit, opposed the application.

Mr. Rohatgi argued before a Division Bench of Justices S.S. Shinde and M.S. Karnik, and said quashing of charges were sought because the National Investigation Agency (NIA) did not seek prior sanction to prosecute him as per Section 197 (prosecution of Judges and public servants) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

He said since the plea was on procedural ground it did not warrant any intervention by the victims. Mr. Bilal’s application said that he had lost his son in the blast and therefore, he was an aggrieved party in the case who deserved to be heard.

The matter was adjourned to November 25.

Mr. Rohatgi had previously contended that Mr. Purohit was an army officer and was discharging his official duty by gathering intelligence. He said sanction to prosecute Mr. Purohit had to be taken before taking cognisance of the offence.

Mr. Rohatgi had previously challenged sanction to prosecute Mr. Purohit under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA). Mr. Purohit has been charged with murder, voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons, promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony under relevant sections of the Arms Act, the Indian Explosive Substance Act, and the UAPA.

The chargesheet filed by the NIA relied upon the statement of a prosecution witness that said, “Mr. Purohit gave him three weapons and ammunition to be kept in his house for a month sometime in 2006. The description of the weapons was also dictated to him. He saw RDX in the house of Mr. Purohit in a green sack at Devlali and that Mr. Purohit confessed to him (the witness) about having supplied RDX for the Samjhauta Express blast.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.