Where grave offences are not probed

Assam tops the list with 1,588 cases

Updated - December 04, 2021 11:17 pm IST

Published - June 19, 2013 02:52 am IST - CHENNAI:

The police have refused investigation in 62 murders, 60 rapes, 216 kidnappings/abductions and 60 dacoity/robbery cases across the county last year, according to the latest national crime data published by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB)

Though these crimes are considered grave in nature, the table with header ‘Disposal of IPC crime cases by police during 2012’ says a total of 2,854 cases were refused investigation by police. While Assam has topped the list with 1,588 cases, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat police have refused investigation in 403, 215 and 184 cases respectively.

Tamil Nadu is among 21 States/Union Territories that have recorded zero cases in this column. Interestingly, the Delhi Police have refused investigation in 109 cases. Besides rapes and murders, the police have also refused investigation in 7 dowry deaths, 39 cases of assault on women with an intention to outrage her modesty and 144 deaths caused by negligence.

However, going by the Police Standing Order, which is derived from the provisions of the IPC and the Cr. PC, police can refuse investigation only in some cases: trivial offences, petty thefts (value of stolen property less than Rs. 10 in value), undetected simple cases, civil disputes etc.

Describing the refusal of investigation in grave offences as an “absurdity” of law, PUCL national general secretary V. Suresh said it was the duty of police to register an FIR and investigate whenever a complainant disclosed a cognisable offence.

“There is no question of police refusing to investigate … we have not come across any such provision in law. Refusing to investigate a cognisable offence is unconstitutional and illegal. The fact that the NCRB is publishing this column in its annual reports every year only shows the continuation of an illegality with the complicity of the police and Home department,” Dr. Suresh said.

Calling for standardisation of the NCRB reports, a senior police official said he had written to the agency on a couple of occasions to check the grounds on which police refused investigation. “There seems to be a communication gap. The Police in any State cannot refuse investigation in cognisable offences. The term “investigation refused” has to be defined … it cannot be confused with the charges found false of mistake of fact or law since there is a separate column for that,” he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.