Venkaiah Naidu corrects Rajya Sabha records over anti-graft bill amendment

The Chair had wrongly informed the House that the bill had been passed by the Lok Sabha.

April 05, 2018 12:48 pm | Updated December 04, 2021 11:56 pm IST - New Delhi

Trinamool Congress Sukhendu Shekhar Roy raises a point of order in the Rajya Sabha on April 5, 2018. Photo: RSTV

Trinamool Congress Sukhendu Shekhar Roy raises a point of order in the Rajya Sabha on April 5, 2018. Photo: RSTV

Rajya Sabha Chairman M. Venkiah Naidu on April 5 corrected the House records to state that a bill to amend the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, that was taken up on April 4, has not been passed by the Lok Sabha yet.

This happened after Sukhendu Shekhar Roy (Trinamool Congress) raised the issue through a point of order, saying Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman P.J. Kurien should recall his statement of April 4 that the bill he has allowed the Minister to move has been passed by the Lok Sabha and transmitted to this House.

Mr. Roy said the bill was brought before the Rajya Sabha on August 19, 2013 and was referred to a parliamentary standing committee for scrutiny.

The panel submitted its report a year later but the legislation was referred to a Select Committee of the Rajya Sabha, which submitted its report on August 11, 2016, he said, adding the government brought the Bill to the House on April 4, 2018.

The bill was not passed by the Lok Sabha.

Mr. Roy said the order passed by the Chair on April 4 was under wrong premise and he should recall it.

Correcting the record, Mr. Naidu said the bill to amend the anti-graft law was the one reported by the Select Committee of the House.

Opposition members protested the attempts by the government to mislead the House on the issue as some Ministers had also said that the bill had been passed by the Lok Sabha.

But the issue was lost in the din created by other opposition parties raising issues ranging from special category status to Andhra Pradesh to the constitution of Cauvery Water Management Board.

Mr. Naidu had to adjourn the proceedings in wake of the slogan shouting by the opposition members.

 

Mr. Roy on April 4 sought a division of vote on introduction of the bill. But due to din and members raising slogans from the Well, Mr. Kurien could not take up the division that could have paved the way for introducion and subsequent passage of the bill.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.