Vacancy in Lokpal selection panel will be filled up soon, Centre tells SC

The post of an eminent jurist in the committee selecting anti-graft ombudsman fell vacant after the demise of senior advocate P.P. Rao last year.

March 06, 2018 12:46 pm | Updated 10:16 pm IST - New Delhi

A high-profile Selection Committee led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi is “currently seized” with the search for an eminent jurist to aid the appointment of anti-corruption ombudsman, Lokpal, the government informed the Supreme Court on Tuesday.

Besides Mr. Modi, the selection committee is composed of Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Lok Sabha Speaker Sumitra Mahajan.

Mallikarjun Kharge, in his capacity as the leader of the single largest opposition party in the Lok Sabha, refused to attend a meeting of the committee convened on March 1. He had been called as a “special invitee”.

Though passed in 2014, the Lokpal and Lokayukta Act of 2013 was not implemented all these years because there was no Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in the 16th Lok Sabha. The 2013 statute includes the LoP as a member of the selection committee. The Act intends the LoP to be the part of the selection committee of the Prime Minister, the Chief Justice of India and the Speaker, which has to first appoint an eminent jurist among their ranks.

However, on April 27 last year, the Supreme Court, in a judgment, clarified that the Lokpal appointment process need not be stalled merely due to the absence of the LoP. The judgment dismissed the government’s reasoning that the Lokpal appointment process should wait till the 2013 Act was amended to replace the LoP with the single largest opposition party leader.

On Tuesday, the government informed a Bench led by Justice Ranjan Gogoi that the appointment process was on full swing. The affidavit said the committee had resolved, in their March 1 meeting, to first fill up the vacancy of an eminent jurist “at the earliest.”

The present hearing before Justice Gogoi’s Bench is based on a contempt petition filed by Common Cause, represented by advocate Prashant Bhushan, for not implementing the April 2017 judgment of the Supreme Court.

The Bench posted the case for hearing on April 17.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.