Sabarimala: In a U-turn, Kerala's Travancore Devaswom Board supports entry of women of all ages

The Supreme Court has reserved its verdict on a batch of petitions seeking review of its September 2018 judgement allowing the entry of women of all ages into the Sabarimala shrine

Updated - November 28, 2021 09:33 am IST

Published - February 06, 2019 03:11 pm IST - New Delhi

A view of the Lord Ayyappa temple at Sabarimala, Kerala. File

A view of the Lord Ayyappa temple at Sabarimala, Kerala. File

The Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB), which runs the historic Sabarimala temple in Kerala, took a U-turn in the Supreme Court on Wednesday by supporting its verdict which had allowed women of all age groups to enter the shrine.

The Board, which also comprise the State government nominees, told a five-judge Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi that it is high time that a particular class not be discriminated on the ground of “biological attributes”.

 

In the forenoon, the Kerala government took the stand that it was in agreement with the September 28, 2018 verdict and had urged dismissal of petitions seeking review of the verdict.

“Article 25 (1) equally entitles all persons to practice religion,” senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, appearing for TDB, told the Bench which also comprise Justices R.F. Nariman, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra.

The Board had earlier vehemently opposed the PIL by Indian Young Lawyers Association saying that the celibate character of Lord Aiyappa at Sabarimala temple was a unique religious feature which was protected under the constitution.

“Women cannot be excluded from any walk of life on biological attributes... equality is the dominant theme of the Constitution”, said Mr. Dwivedi adding that people should gracefully accept the apex court verdict.

The apex court on Wednesday reserved its verdict on a batch of petitions seeking review of the verdict allowing the entry of women of all ages into the Sabarimala shrine.

On September 28, a five-judge Constitution Bench, headed by the then CJI Dipak Misra, in a 4:1 verdict had paved the way for entry of women of all ages into the shrine, saying the ban amounted to gender discrimination.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.