There has never been a woman CJI, says Attorney-General

Attorney-General of India K.K. Venugopal. File   | Photo Credit: The Hindu

Attorney-General K.K. Venugopal on Wednesday took the Supreme Court’s invitation to suggest ways to gender-sensitise judges as an opportunity to tell the court it has never had a woman Chief Justice.

He told the Supreme Court that more women judges in constitutional courts would certainly improve gender sensitivity in the judiciary.

Also read | ‘Ratio of female judges to male judges must be in the same ratio,’ the Supreme Court said in 2015

“Improving the representation of women could also go a long way towards a more balanced and empathetic approach in cases involving sexual violence. For instance, this court has only two women judges as against a sanctioned strength of 34 judges. There has never been a female Chief Justice. This figure is consistently low across the higher judiciary. There are only 80 women judges out of the sanctioned strength of 1,113 judges in the High Courts and the Supreme Court,” he said.

Only two of these 80 women judges are in the Supreme Court and the other 78 are in various High Courts, comprising only 7.2% of the number of judges. There are six High Courts — Manipur, Meghalaya, Patna, Tripura, Telangana, and Uttarakhand — where there are no sitting women judges, he pointed out.

The top law officer was responding to a request from the court to assist it in a case from the Madhya Pradesh High Court. This court had recently passed an order granting bail to an alleged sexual molester. The conditions for grant of bail included visiting his victim at her home, tying a rakhi on her and giving money and sweets to her and her son. Eight women lawyers of the Supreme Court had brought this order to the attention of the apex court. They had challenged the High Court’s ‘trivialisation’ of the victim’s trauma.

Also read | M.P. High Court order trivialisation of rape victim’s trauma, says plea in Supreme Court

Mr. Venugopal, in his written submissions, said judges need to be trained to place themselves in the shoes of the victim of sexual violence while passing orders. They need to assess the crime as if it had been committed on a member of their own family.

He pointed to the dearth of compulsory courses in gender sensitisation in law schools.

Also read | No move to introduce quota for women judges: Law Ministry

“Certain law schools have the subject either as a specialisation or as an elective. Equally, the All India Bar Examination does not contain even a single question or section relating to gender sensitisation. The Bar Council of India may take necessary steps in this regard,” Mr. Venugopal recommended.

Our code of editorial values

This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Printable version | Dec 5, 2021 2:28:49 PM |

Next Story