2G case verdict: the PMO and Pulok Chatterjee cross-connections

As per the special court’s findings in the 2G case, it was not A. Raja, but officials of the PMO who misrepresented the facts to the then Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh

December 22, 2017 10:38 pm | Updated December 01, 2021 06:27 am IST - Chennai

 Pulok Chatterjee

Pulok Chatterjee

A major allegation that former Telecom Minister A. Raja faced was that he had misled the Prime Minister by keeping him in the dark about a tweak he had made in the telecom licensing policy that shifted the basis from “date of application” to “date of payment of fee”.

 

It was not Mr. Raja, but officials of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) who misrepresented the facts to then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, according to the special court’s findings in the 2G case.

Suppressed facts

“It was not Sh. A. Raja, but Sh. Pulok Chatterjee, in consultation with Sh. T.K.A. Nair, who had suppressed the most relevant and controversial part of the letter of Sh. A. Raja from the then Hon’ble Prime Minister,” Special Judge O.P. Saini said.

Mr. Chatterjee was then Joint Secretary in the PMO, while Mr. Nair was the Principal Secretary. He later took over from Mr. Nair as Principal Secretary.

In the letter of December 26, 2007, Mr. Raja sought to explain the three-stage process, that is grant of Letter of Intent, issue of licence, and issue of wireless licence. Dr. Singh had asked that this be examined urgently.

 

After discussing the matter with Mr. Nair, Mr. Chatterjee recorded a long note on January 6, 2008, running to five pages.

The judge said the note did not consider the issue of new licences being set to be issued as per changed criteria. Despite this issue being most controversial, it was ignored and only a “partial view” was presented to the Prime Minister.

“Moreover, the note suffered from the vice of excessive length and technical jargon,” he said.

While Mr. Raja had conveyed to the Prime Minister what he intended to do with telecom licences, only a partial view was presented to Dr. Singh by PMO officials, and Mr. Raja could not be faulted for this.

 

“[The] Prime Minister is a busy executive. Where from would he find the time to read such length notes? The Prime Minister is not expected to be immersed in files. It was much easier and better for him to read and understand the letter of Sh. A. Raja rather than this note of Sh. Pulok Chatterjee.”

Wrapped in mystery

It was not clear from the record if this note was seen by the Prime Minister. However, it was clear that somebody from the PMO had given the go-ahead to the DoT for issue of new licences, “and most probably it was Sh. Pulok Chatterjee himself, as his note records that he had spoken to Secretary (T),” the court said.

The DoT issued 120 new licences on January 8, 2008, and the Prime Minister came to know of it.

“Thereafter only, Sh. Pulok Chatterjee became wiser and rectified his mistake, and placed the correct facts before the then Hon’ble Prime Minister, but by that time, it was too late,” the judge observed.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.