The disregarded tribal villages of Kumram Bheem Asifabad district

Despite CJ’s intervention, their condition remains unchanged

December 05, 2019 12:34 am | Updated 12:35 am IST - S. Harpal Singh

Shivguda villagers with the bullocks given to them under the Conservation-cum- Development Programme.

Shivguda villagers with the bullocks given to them under the Conservation-cum- Development Programme.

The initiative by Adilabad District Legal Services Authority (DLSA) on the orders of Telangana High Court Chief Justice, Raghavendra Singh Chauhan, exposed problems plaguing the dozen tribal villages associated with legendary Advasi martyr Kumram Bheem. However, there is no evidence of desired progress on villagers’ issues.

On September 25, the then DLSA secretary Uday Bhaskar Rao visited the 12 villages which lie on either side of the 22 km stretch of road in Kerameri mandal of the district connecting Hatti and Jodeghat. The latter is where Kumram Bheem was martyred by the Nizam’s forces in 1940, to study problems facing the tribal villagers.

Mr. Rao collected petitions from villagers and coordinated with the district administration to get the issues addressed.

Among major issues identified by the DLSA was demand for rights pattas to pieces of forest land under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act (FRA), 2006, for Local Scheduled Tribe certificates, for economic support schemes, bullocks and carts under the Conservation-Cum Development Plan (CCDP) and 2BHK houses, particularly at Jodeghat. The response of the administration was slow and disheartening.

In a letter dated November 2, the Tribal Development Officer (DTDO) M. Dileep Kumar informed a land survey will be conducted to verify claims for FRA pattas before approval by the committee concerned. Regarding the issue of LST certificates required for lower level government jobs, the letter stated the Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Agency, Utnoor, has ordered all Tahsildars to expedite the process.

Funds shortage

Regarding demand for units under CCDP, the ITDA has cited its existing initiative to develop the Kolam habitations of Linepatar and Shivguda in saturation mode. Finally, for economic support schemes, the reply stated that the ITDA funds are insufficient, and the schemes will be taken up once it receives funds from the government.

The old problem of lack of communication infrastructure in hilly habitations remain unaddressed owing to the the reluctance of BSNL in setting up mobile towers. It cites economic unviability as the reason with the area’s low population and huge cost for the set up.

DLSA Secretary K. Prasad took stock of the situation. “We will conduct another meeting with officials and visit the villages,” he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.