Telephone tapping case accused Thirupathanna’s bail plea rejected

Published - October 02, 2024 06:07 pm IST - HYDERABAD

Justice Juvvadi Sridevi of Telangana High Court had on Tuesday dismissed the criminal petition of Mekala Thirupathanna, a suspended police officer of the rank of additional superintendent of police presently in prison, seeking bail in telephone tapping case.

Pronouncing verdict, the judge said the bench was of the view that it was not a fit case to grant bail as the investigators had to ‘analyse voluminous data and file supplementary chargesheet’. The judge noted that while two other crucial witnesses, including the prime accused T. Prabhakar Rao and a private person, were still at large, the data retrieved from the mobile phone of Thirupathanna was also to be examined.

Referring to the decisions of the apex court cited by the petitioner’s counsel V. Surender Rao and Public Prosecutor (Home) Palle Nageshwara Rao, the judge said in the order that those issues cannot be delved into ‘at this stage’ as ‘granting or rejecting the bail depends on facts of each case and gravity of the offence alleged and the necessity of keeping the petitioner in custody’. The judge noted that police had filed voluminous documents containing details of persons whose phones were tapped by the accused and his team members.

‘Prima facie, the information submitted by the prosecution discloses grave misdeeds of the SIB officials, including the petitioner,’ the order said. The petitioner’s counsel contended that Thirupathanna was falsely implicated in the case. He had nothing to do with the alleged developing of profiles of persons, monitoring their communications and destruction of electronic storage devices, the lawyer argued.

Mr. Palle Nageshwara Rao countered the contentions stating that the petitioners and other accused in the case had formed into group at the behest of the then SIB chief T. Prabhakar Rao (who was said to be in USA presently) and used the SIB premises for their illegal activities. Mr. Rao also argued that data of the petitioner’s mobile phone was retrieved by forensic experts after filing the chargesheet.

These details were yet to be analysed and further investigated into. Hence, the bail plea should be rejected, he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.