Verdict on Mullaperiyar today

Updated - November 16, 2021 06:44 pm IST

Published - May 07, 2014 01:50 am IST - New Delhi:

The Supreme Court will deliver its verdict on Wednesday on the suit filed by Tamil Nadu questioning the law passed by Kerala in 2006, constituting the Dam Safety Authority to prevent the State from raising the water level in the Mullaperiyar dam from 136 ft. to 142 ft. 

A five-Judge Constitution Bench of Justice R.M. Lodha, Justice H.L. Dattu, Justice C.K. Prasad, Justice Madan B. Lokur, and Justice M.Y. Eqbal had reserved verdict in August last.

Tamil Nadu filed the suit in 2006, soon after the law was enacted within few days of the pronouncement of the judgment allowing the State to raise water level from 136 ft. up to 142 ft.

The Bench in 2010 had appointed an empowered committee headed by former Chief Justice of India A.S. Anand to go into the safety aspects and the report was submitted in April 2012. 

Tamil Nadu said the law empowered Kerala’s Dam Safety Authority to reach its own findings as to the safety of the dam and to direct it to suspend or restrict the functioning of the Mullaperiyar dam or even decommission the dam and the State was obliged to comply with such directives.

It argued that by enacting the law, the Kerala had not only encroached into the province of the judiciary but had also disobeyed the apex court judgment.

By enacting the law, Kerala had nullified the judgment and usurped judicial power.

However, Kerala had justified the law on the ground that it was intended to protect the safety of its people. Kerala’s case was that the impugned law related primarily to the modification of contractual rights under an agreement created prior to the commencement of the Constitution. It restricted the rights to use within the State of Kerala and a dam constructed within the State of Kerala would clearly be within the province of Kerala’s legislature.

It said: “By enacting the Amendment Act of 2006 and fixing the storage level of Mullaperiyar Dam at 136 ft., Kerala Legislature has not overruled the judgment of this court but removed the basis of the said judgment by curtailing the legal right to store water above 136ft which flows from the 1886 agreement. The law would not become invalid merely because there was a declaration that the dam was not safe if the water level was raised beyond 136 ft.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.