T.N.’s health infrastructure comes in for praise from SC

‘It was on show during second wave of COVID-19’

July 08, 2021 01:34 am | Updated 01:34 am IST - NEW DELHI

NEW DELHI, 09/04/2013: Supreme Court of India in New Delhi on April 10, 2013. Photo: S. Subramanium

NEW DELHI, 09/04/2013: Supreme Court of India in New Delhi on April 10, 2013. Photo: S. Subramanium

The Supreme Court on Wednesday said Tamil Nadu has one of the better health infrastructure systems in the country and it showed during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Tamil Nadu has one of the better infrastructure in the country,” Justice D.Y. Chandrachud orally remarked at a virtual hearing.

The Bench, also comprising Justice M.R. Shah, was hearing an appeal filed by United India Insurance Company Limited in a case concerning the implementation of the New Health Insurance Scheme of 2012 and 2014 for government employees and pensioners in the State. The State was represented by counsel Joseph Aristotle.

The scheme was based on an agreement between the company and the government. It is a cashless insurance scheme for specified diseases, treatment and surgeries. A network of nominated and approved hospitals comes under it.

United Insurance has challenged a single judge decision of the Madras High Court that it ought to pay the claims of patients who availed themselves of treatment and surgeries at hospitals outside the network. One of the respondent hospitals was represented by advocate Siva Balamurugan.

The single judge had said the company could recover the money from the government. The single judge invoked Article 21 (right to life) to justify the order. The company’s subsequent appeal to the Division Bench of the High Court failed.

The company contended that there was no provision for reimbursement. It reasoned that “a contract of insurance, like any other contract, is a commercial transaction, and parties are bound by the terms of the contract duly indicated in the cashless scheme for defined surgeries, diseases and treatment”. The company said the High Court had erroneously invoked Article 21.

The patients argued that it was a matter of their right to have the claims settled by the company. Mr. Aristotle said the claimants could also get reimbursed under the Tamil Nadu Medical Attendance Rules. On hearing this, Justice Chandrachud remarked approvingly about the State’s health infrastructure. The hearing would resume on Thursday.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.