State challenges NGT order on Sterlite plant

The green tribunal had allowed Vedanta access to the administrative unit of the copper smelter

August 14, 2018 01:19 am | Updated 01:19 am IST - NEW DELHI

The Tamil Nadu government on Monday challenged a National Green Tribunal (NGT) order allowing mining major Vedanta Ltd. access to the administrative unit of the Sterlite copper plant at Thoothukudi.

The State argued that the interim order passed by the NGT was against various provisions of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, and the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981.

It contended that the NGT “failed to note that an order passed by the State government under Section 18 (1)(b) of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, is not appealable before the NGT as per the statute”.

The State, represented by advocate Yogesh Kanna, argued that the matter before the NGT “pertains to civil disputes relating to the environment and not a policy decision taken by the State of Tamil Nadu”.

The tribunal’s Principal Bench, led by its chairperson, Justice A.K. Goel, had specifically barred the company from accessing the production unit and directed the district magistrate to ensure the same.

The State’s move in the Supreme Court comes even as a successive hearing in the case is due on August 20.

The Tamil Nadu government had argued that the NGT had failed to note that the company “had approached various forum [sic] i.e., the Appellate Authority, the TNPCB and the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court,” and therefore, “the present composite appeal is not maintainable in law”.

“The NGT failed to note that the order dated April 9, 2018, was the basic order which dealt with the rejection of the application of the Respondent (company) herein, and that all subsequent orders were merely ministerial acts. It is a settled legal proposition that challenge to consequential order without challenging the basic order/statutory provision on the basis of which the order has been passed cannot be entertained,” the State argued.

The tribunal had already rejected the State’s challenge to its jurisdiction, observing that it would hear the case on merits.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.