Sentence awarded to two in Vachati case suspended

Judge admits appeal, orders notice

October 12, 2011 02:19 am | Updated November 17, 2021 01:21 am IST - CHENNAI:

The Madras High Court on Tuesday suspended the sentence awarded to a 74-year-old retired Conservator of Forests and a Conservator of Forests, Chennai, by the Principal Sessions Judge, Dharmapuri, in the Vachathi case.

The case pertained to the atrocities committed by officials on the residents of Vachathi, a tribal hamlet in Dharmapuri district in June 1992.

Justice Aruna Jagadeesan admitted appeals from the two and ordered notice. She also ordered the suspension of the sentence against them. They should appear once in three months before the court concerned.

The retired and serving officials, M. Harikrishnan of Nandanam Extension here, who was cited as the first accused, and S. Balaji of Madurai, who figured as the fourth accused, were sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, S. Kumaraguru, on September 29.

In the appeal filed through counsel L. Mahendran, the two said that the trial court had erred in convicting them under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act since they were not required to perform any duties under that legislation.

Mr. Harikrishnan said that the lower court erred in convicting him under section 201 (Causing disappearance of evidence of offence, or giving false information to screen offender) IPC.

There was no material to show he caused disappearance of evidence of commission of the offence with the intention of screening the offender.

The sessions court ought to have seen that Mr. Balaji along with 40 others was camping at Harur from June 20, 1992 morning as they were planning a joint action to seize sandalwood and prevent smuggling. Mr. Balaji acted in his official capacity to do his lawful duty.None of the witnesses had implicated him as a member of an unlawful assembly and that he participated in the occurrence.

The two said they were directly selected for government service. They could not be prosecuted without the government's sanction. The investigating officer had admitted that no sanction had been obtained to prosecute them. Hence their conviction without proper sanction was vitiated.

After hearing V. Gopinath, senior counsel for the appellants, Mrs. Justice Aruna Jagadeesan suspended the sentence.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.