Jayalalithaa on tenterhooks again

In May 2001, she was acquitted by another judge in the Rs. 10.16 crore television procurement case. These judgments were later upheld by the High Court.

May 11, 2015 12:00 am | Updated November 16, 2021 05:04 pm IST

By now, she must be used to waiting for crucial verdicts. On the eve of the Karnataka High Court verdict on her appeal against conviction for holding unexplained assets worth over Rs. 53 crore, former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa will surely be reminded of the day in December 2001 when she awaited a judgment in similar circumstances from the Madras High Court.

At that time, too, she was out of office, barred from electoral contest and unseated from the Chief Minister’s post. She had been convicted in as many as three cases, and the judgment awaited was on her appeal against all three sentences.

Judicial opinion was in her favour then, as on December 4, 2001, she was absolved of all charges by a common order of Justice N. Dinakar, who set aside her conviction in two TANSI land deal cases and one relating to illegalities in permitting the construction of Pleasant Stay Hotel in Kodaikanal. She had been sentenced three years and two years in prison in respect of two TANSI land purchases and a one-year term in the hotel case. The favourable verdict resurrected her political career that was briefly endangered after a landmark Supreme Court judgment struck down Governor Fathima Beevi’s controversial decision to appoint her Chief Minister soon after her party won the 2001 Assembly election even though she could not contest from any seat. She won a by-election and was back as Chief Minister.

Prosecuted several times, mainly in relation to charges that date back to her first regime of 1991-1996, Ms. Jayalalithaa had emerged unscathed at the trial stage in other cases. Luck smiled on her first in June 1999, when a Chennai court discharged her without trial from a case alleging a Rs. 6.50 crore irregularity in the import of coal from Indonesia for TNEB.

In May 2001, she was acquitted by another judge in the Rs. 10.16 crore television procurement case. These judgments were later upheld by the High Court.

On the eve of yet another judgment, she is once again on tenterhooks.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.