Qatar World Cup 2022LIVE updates: Tunisia vs France; Australia vs Denmark

Obtain prior remarks before voicing opinion about others in media: HC

Judge restrains YouTuber ‘Savukku’ Shankar from making defamatory allegations against G Square Realtors

September 09, 2022 12:42 am | Updated 12:42 am IST - Chennai

Whenever a person voices opinion against another individual or entity, either through the print or electronic media or in any other form, he/she should exercise caution and follow a code of obtaining the remarks of the individual or entity before expressing such opinion, the Madras High Court has said.

Justice C.V. Karthikeyan made the observations while granting an interim injunction restraining YouTuber Savukku Shankar from making defamatory statements against G Square Realtors. The judge granted the injunction following a civil suit filed by the realtor seeking notional damages of over ₹1 crore from him.

The judge said the realtor was seriously aggrieved by various statements made by the defendant against it on social media. Though such statements could be assessed only when they were put to test during the course of trial, the interim injunction was being granted since they would prima facie affect the realtor’s business.

The allegations, prima facie, do not appear to be based on facts and they had not been put to the plaintiff before being levelled in the public domain. Therefore, an interim injunction naturally follows, the judge said and ordered notice to the YouTuber returnable by September 29.

Giving a piece of general advice to everyone, the judge wrote that those who express opinion about others in the media must first put the other person on notice and obtain their remarks before making the allegations public. Thereafter, it must be left to the readers or viewers to form their opinion based on the version of both sides. “Expressing opinions without caution to facts would invite allegations that they are defamatory and only establishes that caution was not prudently exercised by the defendant and that there was intent to defame the plaintiff,” the judge added.

Top News Today

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.