Tamil Nadu

Notification on green clearance for industrial projects gets HC nod

A view of the Madras High Court in Chennai.

A view of the Madras High Court in Chennai.   | Photo Credit: V. Ganesan

Additional Solicitor-General clarifies that environmental clearance contingent on meeting norms

The Madras High Court has upheld the validity of a notification issued by Union Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change on March 14 permitting grant of ex post facto environmental clearances for industrial project proponents who had commenced, continued or completed a project without obtaining clearance under the Environmental Protection Act of 1986 and the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification issued under it.

Disposing of a public interest litigation petition filed by the Puducherry Environment Protection Association, represented by its honorary president R. Kothandaraman, the first Division Bench of Chief Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice M. Sundar recorded Additional Solicitor- General (ASG) G. Rajagopalan’s submission that grant of such ex post facto clearances shall be a one-time measure and that public hearings would certainly be held before granting such permissions.

A. Yogeswaran, counsel for the petitioner association, had assailed the notification on the ground that insistence on obtaining environmental clearance was based on the precautionary principle, and therefore, obtaining such clearance before commencement of the projects was imperative and non-negotiable under the Environmental Protection Act. He also pointed out that the Centre’s notification was silent on conducting public hearings before granting ex post facto clearance.

The counsel recalled that the Centre had issued a similar notification on January 27, 1994, to permit violators to set their houses in order. That notification had set a cut-off date up to March 31, 1999, which was extended up to June 30, 2001, and again till March 31, 2003, through successive notifications. One more notification was issued on September 14, 2006, and it continues to be extended for the fifth time through the notification under challenge in the present case, he claimed.

‘Presumption wrong’

Mr. Rajagopalan contended that the case had been filed on a wrong presumption that all projects which had not obtained prior environment clearance would be given ex post facto clearance. He said that an Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) would assess individual projects and grant clearance with retrospective effect only to projects which had been constructed at permissible sites and which could be allowed to operate on a sustainable basis after complying with environmental norms.

In cases where the EAC gives a negative opinion, all legal proceedings, including penal action under Section 19 of the Environmental Protection Act would be initiated against the project proponents and no consent to operate the project or occupy the premises would be issued besides ensuring closure of the project, the ASG assured the court.

Authoring the judgment for the Bench, Mr. Justice Sundar held that it would suffice to dispose of the case after recording the ASG’s submissions. The Chief Justice concurred with the view taken by her companion judge, yet chose to add more to it by writing a separate judgment stressing the need for a court of law to strike a balance between protecting the environment as well as the livelihood of employees dependant on projects which had failed to obtain prior environmental clearance.

“The question is whether an establishment contributing to the economy of the country and providing livelihood to hundreds of people should be closed down only because of failure to obtain prior environmental clearance, even though the establishment may not otherwise be violating pollution laws, or the pollution, if any, can conveniently and effectively be checked. The answer necessarily has to be in the negative,” Ms. Justice Banerjee said.

A letter from the Editor


Dear reader,

We have been keeping you up-to-date with information on the developments in India and the world that have a bearing on our health and wellbeing, our lives and livelihoods, during these difficult times. To enable wide dissemination of news that is in public interest, we have increased the number of articles that can be read free, and extended free trial periods. However, we have a request for those who can afford to subscribe: please do. As we fight disinformation and misinformation, and keep apace with the happenings, we need to commit greater resources to news gathering operations. We promise to deliver quality journalism that stays away from vested interest and political propaganda.

Support Quality Journalism
Recommended for you
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Printable version | Jun 2, 2020 2:25:38 PM | https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/notification-on-green-clearance-for-industrial-projects-gets-hc-nod/article19898698.ece

Next Story