NGT fines builder in Theni for constructing project without environmental clearance

Stops short of ordering demolitions to protect bonafide buyers

August 01, 2022 10:01 pm | Updated 10:01 pm IST - CHENNAI

The southern bench of the National Green Tribunal has directed a builder in Theni to pay environmental compensation of Rs. 3 crore for constructing a project without Environment Clearance and to not carry out any further construction or expansion in the project area till they get the EC.

The bench while holding that constructions made without obtaining EC will be deemed to be unauthorised, stopped short of ordering demolition applying the “Doctrine of Proportionality” and hardship that would have to be faced by innocent and bonafide purchasers for occupying the area.

The case relates to the development of a township in Genguvarpatti revenue village, Periyakulam Taluk in Theni district by a private builder. The applicant alleged that the project was more than 50 hectares but the builder had got approval from the Town and Country Planning Authority showing a smaller extent of land to avoid obtaining the EC. The project was situated within the Kodaikanal Wildlife Sanctuary, the applicant alleged.

The builder claimed the project was spread only within 49.31 hectares and there was no need to get an EC.

The Tribunal said it came to the conclusion that there was wilful evasion by the builder by reducing the area marginally to bring the activity out of the EIA Notification, 2006. “Since the project has been completed and houses have been constructed and the people are occupying the house, it will be harsh if we order demolition of the houses and the innocent purchasers who are senior citizens will be put to serious hardship,” the bench said.

The bench also chided the builder for not producing the original prospectus of the township giving an indication of the extent of the land and the nature of facilities to be provided. “That document was wilfully suppressed by the 9th Respondent [the builder] before the Tribunal though it was directed to be produced the same by giving oral direction so as to ascertain the real intention of the project proponent in launching the project initially,” the Tribunal said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.