May take legal action on Speaker’s inaction against Panneerselvam and other expelled leaders, AIADMK tells Madras High Court

The party made this submission during the hearing of individual appeals preferred by four expelled AIADMK leaders against a single judge’s order; the judges have decided to hear the matter at length on Monday, April 3

March 31, 2023 03:59 pm | Updated 04:22 pm IST - CHENNAI

Madras High Court. File

Madras High Court. File

The AIADMK on Friday told the Madras High Court that it is contemplating filing a case, since the Legislative Assembly Speaker M. Appavu has so far not taken any call on the party’s request to not consider O. Panneerselvam and other expelled leaders as members of the AIADMK legislature party.

Appearing before the third Division Bench of Justices R. Mahadevan and Mohammed Shaffiq, Senior Counsel Vijay Narayan said, the AIADMK MLAs were unable to discuss anything among themselves in the House because the Speaker had not even changed the seating arrangement of Mr. Panneerselvam and the other expelled members.

The submission was made during the hearing of individual appeals preferred by four expelled AIADMK leaders against a single judge’s March 28 order, refusing to grant an interim injunction restraining the party from implementing its July 11, 2022 general council resolutions and the consequent election held to the post of general secretary.

When Justice Mahadevan wanted to know why the appellants should not be provided some kind of interim protection either until the disposal of the present appeals or the main civil suits pending before the single judge, Mr. Narayan said, no injury would be caused to Mr. Panneerselvam who was not supported by more than 95% of the party members.

Referring to the party bylaws, which require a contestant to the post of general secretary to be proposed by 10 district secretaries and seconded by 10 more district secretaries, the Senior Counsel said, he could produce before the court the affidavits of at least 68 out of 70 district secretaries who do not want to endorse Mr. Panneerselvam’s candidature.

On the other hand, Senior Counsel P.S. Raman, C. Manishankar, Abdul Saleem and A.K. Sriram told the court that the single judge had come to a prima facie conclusion of infraction of bylaws in the expulsion of the four appellants without issuing any notice to them. Yet, he had refused to grant an interim injunction as prayed for, by considering the balance of convenience.

Stating that they have a fair chance of succeeding in the appeals due to the prima facie satisfaction recorded by the single judge, the counsel insisted that some kind of interim protection be granted to the appellants, until the disposal of the appeals or the disposal of the civil suits, especially because the Legislative Assembly was in session at present.

After hearing the preliminary arguments advanced by both sides, the judges decided to hear the matter at length on Monday and asked the counsel to complete their pleadings by then. They said, a call on granting interim protection would also be taken on that day and it would also be considered whether the single judge could be asked to dispose of the suits at the earliest.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.